Marcus and everyone:
Based on two runs now, the new Hurd package doesn't seem to do that
progressively-slower until it grinds to a halt thing anymore. I'll
test more over the weekend as I try to push more packages through.
binutils triggered the fork failure again.
libtime-hires-perl compiles f
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:44:41AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> Are there any vendors in North America prepared to sell the CDs? I
> am a long way away from the Americas and Europe.
What's involved in selling the CDs? I could do this through my
company if you just need someone to sell these.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Farid Hajji wrote:
> I got the E1 series from bitbone.de quite quickly. They didn't update
> their site since then, but you could explicitely ask them by mailing
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm waiting for Phil to mkisofs the F2 series and
> will order them as well, probably again
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Farid Hajji wrote:
> Ahemm... while we're at it: if you're booting from the F1 ISO, it
> may well be, that you're first booting Linux, not gnumach. At least,
> that was the way, Phil did realize the E1-series I'm using here. That
> probably stuck in F1 as well. Are you sure th
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Ian Duggan wrote:
> That's a thought. Is there available, or does there exist an easy way to
> generate the dependency tree for Debian packages?
>
> It might be useful as a guide for determining the order in which to
> attack package building.
I can prepare a list of those p
> > Therefore I'd like to ask if anyone on the list has a spare set of
> > current Hurd CD-ROMs that s/he could send me. I'm of course willing to
> > refund your expenses. I live in Germany, near Cologne.
>
> There are two Hurd CD vendors listed in the vendors page at
> www.debian.org, one of wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in a state of fury:
> > Anyway, this fucking kernel still stops/halts just after the fdc gets
> > recognized. I already had taken off almost all cards I have in my system,
> > but no change. Is there anything I should know of, where gnumach does
> > NOT run on? Else, think a
> > IIRC, exim has all the fixes necessary in the BTS to make it run, so
> > with any luck you'll have both exim and sendmail by the end of the
> > weekend.
> >
> That is great, quite a lot depends on it. Thanks.
That's a thought. Is there available, or does there exist an easy way to
generate t
"Ian Duggan" wrote
>...What hardware are you trying to boot with, and
> how are you going about trying to build the system. The installation
> procedure is still primitive, and requires developer level knowledge of
> a few things. At the minimum, you should be familiar with how
> bootloaders work a
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I intend to add a gnumach-lean to the gnumach package. This will increase
> its size by about 200kB. Is this acceptable, or do you favour a split up
> into a seperate binary package?
I have a preference for using a different package, but it's not a
t
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> I'd like to try out Debian GNU/Hurd once again to see what has changed since
> one year ago. Unfortunately I only have a 33.6 modem so I cannot even
> think of downloading ~1 gig of ISO images.
>
> Therefore I'd like to ask if anyone on the list has a
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:52:21PM +0200, Henning Riedel wrote:
> I still try to get the kernel up and running but nobody actually seems
> to realize, that a really lean kernel should be made just for installing,
> so that all should be able to boot that piece of shit.
An accurate description of t
Henning you are the real sucker, you missed the first rule:
Don't panic!
Ok, this will be my apologies to Neal:
I've crashed my whole Linux-Part on my system while trying to install
the Hurd today from that new Hurd-F1.
There is some trouble here, and I think it was the wrong time, to write
a pos
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Which makes ae an unlikely candidate. I don't think this is a show
> stopper, since the old one works fine.
The ae in the tarball works so we are OK.
> IIRC, exim has all the fixes necessary in the BTS to make it run, so
> with any luck you'll have bot
> This fucking Hurd still sucks!
Bees with honey.
> I still try to get the kernel up and running but nobody actually seems
> to realize, that a really lean kernel should be made just for installing,
> so that all should be able to boot that piece of shit. That's not the first
> mail I send about
This fucking Hurd still sucks!
I still try to get the kernel up and running but nobody actually seems
to realize, that a really lean kernel should be made just for installing,
so that all should be able to boot that piece of shit. That's not the first
mail I send about booting problems, but nobody
On Friday 27 April 2001 20:10, Johannes Rohr wrote:
> Dear all,
Moin, moin!
>
> I'd like to try out Debian GNU/Hurd once again to see what has changed since
> one year ago. Unfortunately I only have a 33.6 modem so I cannot even
> think of downloading ~1 gig of ISO images.
>
> Therefore I'd like
Dear all,
I'd like to try out Debian GNU/Hurd once again to see what has changed since
one year ago. Unfortunately I only have a 33.6 modem so I cannot even
think of downloading ~1 gig of ISO images.
Therefore I'd like to ask if anyone on the list has a spare set of
current Hurd CD-ROMs that s/he
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 02:15:20PM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> Three questions. Is it likely that ae and exim will be fixed and in the
> main archive by then?
I've been mostly catching up on older stuff to build. Basically, I
haven't found anything documenting the "Corrent" way to do shared
I have started the preliminary work on the F2 CDs and they will not have
any non-free. This has meant that the size of the Hurd sub mirror is now
1.3 GIG, just over two CDs once the boot-disks are included.
I hope to freeze the Hurd sub-mirror in about five days and produce the
images about two t
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 08:55:52AM +0100, dog wrote:
> > > perhaps; the debs still reference console-utilities, and there is no hurd
> > > package providing console-utilities.
> >
> > What do you mean by reference? Please be as specific about the details as
> > you can.
>
> console-common recomm
quoth Marcus Brinkmann:
> > perhaps; the debs still reference console-utilities, and there is no hurd
> > package providing console-utilities.
>
> What do you mean by reference? Please be as specific about the details as
> you can.
console-common recommends console-utilities; console-data recomm
22 matches
Mail list logo
