On 29 Apr 2001, Oystein Viggen wrote:
> Quoth Philip Charles:
>
> > FYI, 570 of the 2440 packages in the Hurd sub-archive are excluded by
> > debian-cd. This is almost certainly done because of dependency problems.
> > This happened without any intervention on my part through exclusion
> > list
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 12:28:40AM +0100, Neil Levine wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 06:36:01PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann a ecrit:
> >
> > This is the "rpath" solution. The path to the library is hard coded in the
> > binary. Debian has a policy against rpath, so we don't use it. This is why
> >
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 06:36:01PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann a ecrit:
>
> This is the "rpath" solution. The path to the library is hard coded in the
> binary. Debian has a policy against rpath, so we don't use it. This is why
> you need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Thanks. Is there any reason why this
> ... skipping GRUB stuff
Please do include the records of modules in loaded, since that can always
be part of the problem problem.
> Welcome to GNUmach 1.2.91-OSKit!
> user trap, type 2, code = 14295c
> Dump of trap-state at 0x0d6d7e80:
> EAX 000e EBX 001 ECX 0dadc000 EDX 0dadc000
> ESI
Hello!
I did another test boot and copied down the error messages.
Here they are:
... skipping GRUB stuff
Welcome to GNUmach 1.2.91-OSKit!
user trap, type 2, code = 14295c
Dump of trap-state at 0x0d6d7e80:
EAX 000e EBX 001 ECX 0dadc000 EDX 0dadc000
ESI 20584145 EDI 0d6d7eb4 EBP 30303030
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:18:08PM -0600, Brad Marks wrote:
> [1] It seems like everybody's got their own hurd site right now with
> their own work on it, and few of them are actually referenced
> anywhere on hurd.gnu.org. Seems to me it would be useful to either
> try to get this stuff moved/mirr
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 06:36:01PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> However, the new elf standard has DT_RUNPATH (or so), which I hope
> we can use. It is like rpath, but has not such a high precedence.
Is there a copy of the ELF standard publicly available?
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 12:18:08PM -0600, Brad Marks wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:43:28PM +0200, Andreas L. Gustafsson wrote:
> > > Huh!? Is there two different kernels available? I think Uhurd has a big
> > > documentation problme. This ought to be mentioned on some webpage.
> > >
> > > W
Quoth Philip Charles:
> FYI, 570 of the 2440 packages in the Hurd sub-archive are excluded by
> debian-cd. This is almost certainly done because of dependency problems.
> This happened without any intervention on my part through exclusion
> lists etc. Don't ask me to identify them at this stage
"Andreas L. Gustafsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Huh!? Is there two different kernels available?
Yes, GNU Mach and oskit Mach. Debian GNU/Hurd will install the former.
I don't think there deb packages for oskit mach, you'll have to roll
your own. Searching the archives of this list for "oski
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:43:28PM +0200, Andreas L. Gustafsson wrote:
> > Huh!? Is there two different kernels available? I think Uhurd has a big
> > documentation problme. This ought to be mentioned on some webpage.
> >
> > What is diffrent? Which one do I need for what functionality.
> Which o
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 05:29:13PM +0100, Neil Levine wrote:
> Thanks for the help before with the Perl and libc issue. I seemed to
> kick off an interesting topic :-) I am still learning about the HURD
> and am having to "unlearn what I have learned" from Linux and not take
> things like ldconfig
Thanks for the help before with the Perl and libc issue. I seemed to
kick off an interesting topic :-) I am still learning about the HURD
and am having to "unlearn what I have learned" from Linux and not take
things like ldconfig for granted :-) From what I gather from the
discussion that followed
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:43:28PM +0200, Andreas L. Gustafsson wrote:
> Huh!? Is there two different kernels available? I think Uhurd has a big
> documentation problme. This ought to be mentioned on some webpage.
>
> What is diffrent? Which one do I need for what functionality. Which one is
> the
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 08:55:45AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I only
> report porting problems to the upstream Debian maintainers, and it's
> up to them if they'd like to report portability problems to the
> upstream.
Small correction. They are expected to report upstream bugs back upstream.
> Y
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:43:28PM +0200, Andreas L. Gustafsson wrote:
> I for one just hate dpkg and friends! :)
>
> If I just can get gcc to work under Hurd I'll be happy again! :)
>
> Seriously, I do think that to make Hurd more popular and more widely used
> we need to move away from the .de
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Andreas L. Gustafsson wrote:
> F1 F2 E1? Where do I find these ISO images? I can't find any links to it
> from the Debian/Hurd ports page. There are just a link telling about it's
> in "active development". Time to update the webpage, someone?
>
> It's not a good way to sprea
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Zeno Gantner wrote:
> What about putting a list of people who offer to burn and ship Hurd CDs
> to the new hurd.gnu.org site?
> It would be no problem for me to do that. I'll take the ones from
> the Debian vendor list and everybody who writes me a short mail
> (including an m
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Farid Hajji wrote:
> Henning, how do you expect us to help, if you don't provide us with
> somewhat more detailed data?
>
> 1. What kernel are you using? gnumach or oskit-mach? Which version?
>Where/When did you get that from? Did you compile it yourself and
>if so, w
Philip Charles wrote:
> Get yourselves on the Vendors list at debian.org, it would help Marcus in
> his "The Hurd should be recognised campaign".
IMHO, this a really important issue, so please follow Philip's advice...
What about putting a list of people who offer to burn and ship Hurd CDs
to the
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Henning Riedel wrote:
> You got the point, the installation seems to be ok, except some minor things
> that might be a little confusing:
> 1.) Looking for the basehurd.tgz on the CD. There are a lot of subdirs on
> the
> CD's. I might be gotten a little to comfortable by
Henning Riedel wrote:
>
> AMD K7 600Mhz on ASUS K7M (AMD750,VIA82C686B), 192MB SDRAM
> ELSA Erazor III Pro (Riva TNT2) 32MB AGP
You need to recompile your gnumach, I had a similar problem, many others had
too(you will know if you check the archives of this list). You will also find
the instructio
23 matches
Mail list logo
