Title: webzin8호
I just recently got my Hurd setup semi-working (I can log in, in other words).
I believe I need to recompile GnuMach for network card support and IDE disk
controller support. My network card is tulip-based, and the disk controller
is CMD649 (close and possibly ??? compatible relative of the CMD6
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 01:30:49PM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > Don't worry, we have not really started yet. The glibc had some bugs, and
> > I am not sure we have sorted them out by now. We will make announcements
> > here what is going to h
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:49:48PM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
>
> > It will probably take me about 10 days to get the *hurd-i386.deb's
> > when it does happen.
>
> Ouch. When you get to this point, would it be useful if you had a
> remote machine to w
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Don't worry, we have not really started yet. The glibc had some bugs, and
> I am not sure we have sorted them out by now. We will make announcements
> here what is going to happen early enough, and if we are talking about days,
> you can always ste
I found this. I hope people find this informative, if it is correct and
relevant. I have now discovered how to use dict.
Phil.
1 definition found
>From The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing (13 Mar 01) [foldoc]:
Application Binary Interface
(ABI) The interface by which an {applic
In porting the Hurd to other Microkernels I wonder where it puts the use
of IPC. I see IPC is pretty heavy in use in Mach but hardley mentioned in
L4 and I do understand IPC is important in the Hurd.
IS there going to be a standard within the Hurd that allows an application
programmer to add an en
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:11:58AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > The best time to change the names will be when the architecture
> > handling is reworked (if it will ever happen).
>
> Hmm.. What would it take to overcome inertia on this?
I have absolutely no idea.
> Since we're
> likely to be t
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:01:19PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Since we're on the topic, please let us know what the best way to
> > do this is. We're essentially re-creating the hurd-i386 arch -
> > The new .debs will be binary incompatible with the old ones.
> At one occasion the old tr
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:53:53AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Since we're on the topic, please let us know what the best way to do
> this is. We're essentially re-creating the hurd-i386 arch - The new
> .debs will be binary incompatible with the old ones.
At one occasion the old tree was delete
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 04:24:46PM +, James Troup wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > We will be manually rebuilding [0] every package that is currently
> > in the Hurd archive and probably uploading in one pass.
>
> If you try that (or even threaten to), I will personally
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 04:24:46PM +, James Troup wrote:
> > We will be manually rebuilding [0] every package that is currently
> > in the Hurd archive and probably uploading in one pass.
>
> If you try that (or even threaten to), I will personally take great
> pleasure in ensuring *hurd-i386
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We will be manually rebuilding [0] every package that is currently
> in the Hurd archive and probably uploading in one pass.
If you try that (or even threaten to), I will personally take great
pleasure in ensuring *hurd-i386* is auto-deleted from incoming
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:49:48PM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> When is this likely to happen? I am preparing for the H3 CD set at the
> moment and hope to have it ready in about 5 -10 days. I don't want to be
> caught in the middle of the change.
>
> It will probably take me about 10 days to g
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:49:48PM +1300, Philip Charles wrote:
> > I've got an autobuilder here that is turned off while we prepare to do
> > an ABI change. When that is complete, package building will resume.
>
> When is this likely to happen? I am preparing for the H3 CD set at the
> moment
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:31:08AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I don't know how dreppers announcement
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2002-01/msg00040.html will
> affect the pthreads folks either. It doesn't seem like waiting for
> them before we start is a good idea.
I think it is a g
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:41:56PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> > > Is there a need for a Hurd autobuilder? I noticed that there are a
> > > great deal of packages out of date for Hurd
> >
> > I've got an autobuilder here that is turned off while we prepare to do
> > an ABI change. When that i
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 09:45:23AM +0100, Oystein Viggen wrote:
> > I've got an autobuilder here that is turned off while we prepare
> > to do an ABI change.
> Does this also mean that pthreads support is close to ready?
This change is only planned to be Libio and Gcc(g++)-3. Marcus and
Jeroen
* [Jeff Bailey]
> I've got an autobuilder here that is turned off while we prepare to do
> an ABI change.
Does this also mean that pthreads support is close to ready?
Oystein
--
When in doubt: Think again.
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 05:49, Philip Charles wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> > I've got an autobuilder here that is turned off while we prepare to do
> > an ABI change. When that is complete, package building will resume.
>
> When is this likely to happen?
Good question. Gl
Gerhard Muntingh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 64MB should work fine, if you don't try too much crazy things.
... and if you have enough swap enabled.
moritz
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98
21 matches
Mail list logo
