I haven't changed the CC line, but you should. oskit-users is only dead
becuase you aren't using it! And for Hurd-related development discussions
that are not about Debian release issues or porting other packages or
packaging/integration issues, the right list is bug-hurd.
To take a new Linux co
Derek L Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been twiddling with adding the linux random device to oskit. I'm
> making some progress, but mostly I've been learning about oskit.
I'm afraid I can't help you with the details, but I think that the
tricky part of /dev/random is *not* the output
Hi,
Sorry if this is the wrong list, I know about oskit-users, but that
seems pretty dead right now and ultimatly I'm doing this for the
benefit of the hurd.
I've been twiddling with adding the linux random device to oskit. I'm
making some progress, but mostly I've been learning about oskit.
O
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:34:58PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> El dt, 05 mar 2002 18:03:41 Jeroen Dekkers ha escrit:
> >On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 05:45:04PM +0100, Martin Man wrote:
> >> yep and the system info, VMWare 3.0 workstation with IDE virtual disk
> >
> >We don't and will never support pro
The xfree86v3 source package should be built for the following
architectures (only):
alpha arm i386 m68k powerpc sparc
Right now, it looks like only alpha is autobuilding it.
Can someone add it to the lists for arm, m68k, powerpc, and sparc?
If any of the post-potato architectures have in their
> I now build oskit directly in its top level dir, not in build, to
> simplify the remote debugging.
Do not expect this to work. This is true in many packages.
Separate build directories are a good thing.
6 matches
Mail list logo
