GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Joachim Nilsson
Hello everybody! I'm getting back to the Hurd and have, at least, started using it on my gateway machine at home. I've so far had no problems, of course, but I have a small issue that bugs me a bit. In Linux there is the kernel parameters to decide what ethernet card gets to be eth0 and any

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 03:59:32PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: As much as I appreciate some aspects of the Hurd's design, I must say I never really saw the point of having a microkernel if it doesn't allow you to implement drivers as services. What makes you think we don't allow this?

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 03:59:32PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: As much as I appreciate some aspects of the Hurd's design, I must say I never really saw the point of having a microkernel if it doesn't allow you to implement drivers as services. That the device drivers are part of GNU Mach is

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Tobin Fricke
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote: 1) I don't see a question here. (Or at least, there's nothing that ends with a question mark.) It helps to read the original message: | My setup is two ISA cards, one 3c509 and one NE2000. In Linux the | 3c509 automatically (without any specific

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Philip Dodd
1) I don't see a question here. (Or at least, there's nothing that ends with a question mark.) Then I don't think you're looking in the right places. 2) I did point out to him that his assumptions were wrong. A couple have now pointed out that drivers are possible in userspace, and even

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:38:23PM +0200, Philip Dodd wrote: What are you looking for? Answers, I should think. Perhaps you should reask the question then. Consider that if many of us answered the email and failed to answer the question, that the problem is in the asking. -- Frankly,

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Philip Dodd
What are you looking for? Answers, I should think. Perhaps you should reask the question then. Consider that if many of us answered the email and failed to answer the question, that the problem is in the asking. Please re-read the thread and re-think your position on where the

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Kevin Everets
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 08:32:42AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: 1) I don't see a question here. (Or at least, there's nothing that ends with a question mark.) You're looking at Emile's post, which was an off-topic response to Joachim's question (which is not in the quotes you posted). I suspect

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Robert Marlow
No offence meant, Jeff. Apologies but the original message had been lost in the thread. Here's the original post: Hello everybody! I'm getting back to the Hurd and have, at least, started using it on my gateway machine at home. I've so far had no problems, of course, but I have a small issue

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:54:01PM +0800, Robert Marlow wrote: My setup is two ISA cards, one 3c509 and one NE2000. In Linux the 3c509 automatically (without any specific kernel parameters) gets to be eth0 (@irq 9) and the NE2000 is my eth1 (@irq 5). In GNUmach it's the reversed, what

User-mode drivers (was: Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?)

2002-04-17 Thread Emile van Bergen
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: [SNIP] OSKit provides a framework for having drivers in user space. I think you just need to implement a few library calls to make it happen. GNU Mach provides a framework for having drivers in user space. You can get interrupts delivered as

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:45:57PM +0200, Philip Dodd wrote: What are you looking for? Answers, I should think. Perhaps you should reask the question then. Consider that if many of us answered the email and failed to answer the question, that the problem is in the asking.

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Roland McGrath
I think the problem is that nobody knows the answer to the question. And they're too lazy to look! The probes of net devices are all done in linux/dev/drivers/net/Space.c, where the order of the drivers in the ethif_probe determines the order in which they are set up and assigned ethN names.

Roadmap?

2002-04-17 Thread Joachim Nilsson
Hello again! The last mail I sent rendered a completely different discussion than I initially intended. But all the talk about user space drivers and such actually made me start thinking. Is there currently any roadmap for the Hurd available? If I try to clearify, I mean a general overview,

Re: User-mode drivers (was: Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?)

2002-04-17 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:55:19PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: I am, but it's been a while since I studied anything Hurd-related, so it may take a while for me to get actually started. We are not in a hurry. Just theoretically, it seems an approach could be to create a wrapper that allows

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Joachim Nilsson
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:47:57PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote: I think the problem is that nobody knows the answer to the question. And they're too lazy to look! I tried, but the tree was a bit too big to get to know all that quickly in a couple of days. The probes of net devices are all

ABI Switch for hurd-i386

2002-04-17 Thread Jeff Bailey
Package: ftp.debian.org Please wipe out all hurd-i386 packages so we can make our ABI switch. Tks, Jeff Bailey -- Mommy, what does *this* red button do? pgprdUgTvSHPi.pgp Description: PGP signature

IMPORTANT - ABI Switch

2002-04-17 Thread Jeff Bailey
In consultation with Marcus, I have now formally requested that the Debian `hurd-i386' binaries be wiped so that we can begin uploading. We will be working with the release manager to make sure that we're uploading the new packages at a rate that's comfortable for the mirrors. We have just over

Re: IMPORTANT - ABI Switch

2002-04-17 Thread Derek L Davies
Nice job Jeff! Derek Jeff Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In consultation with Marcus, I have now formally requested that the Debian `hurd-i386' binaries be wiped so that we can begin uploading.

Re: IMPORTANT - ABI Switch

2002-04-17 Thread Derek L Davies
Doh! I didn't mean to wide reply... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IMPORTANT - ABI Switch

2002-04-17 Thread Philip Charles
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote: In consultation with Marcus, I have now formally requested that the Debian `hurd-i386' binaries be wiped so that we can begin uploading. We will be working with the release manager to make sure that we're uploading the new packages at a rate that's

Re: IMPORTANT - ABI Switch

2002-04-17 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 11:01:09PM -0400, Derek L Davies wrote: Doh! I didn't mean to wide reply... =) It gives me a chance to single out Marcus and say that any thanks directed at me need to be equally directed to him. -- Frankly, trying to turn Windows into a decent educational software