I have just tried to upgrade libc:
Preparing to replace libc0.3 2.2.5-6 (using
.../libc0.3_2.2.5-13_hurd-i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libc0.3 ...
dpkg: warning - old post-removal script returned error exit status 127
dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
dpkg: error
Le lun 19/08/2002 à 11:36, Michal Suchanek a écrit :
Is there any place I can read something about these issues or can you
give other advice?
Did you read Marcus Brinkmann's recent mail (and the following answers)
about Upgrading Debian GNU/Hurd?
Snark on #hurd, #hurdfr
PS:
lists.debian.org
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:36:15AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
I have just tried to upgrade libc:
Preparing to replace libc0.3 2.2.5-6 (using
.../libc0.3_2.2.5-13_hurd-i386.deb) ...
http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/extra-files/hurd-upgrade.txt
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian
Hi all,
I have just upgraded me server to dual PPro so
my old one, a 486 is sitting in storage. :)
Anyway, I just looked at
http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
and there seems to be no Debian/hurd boxes for
developers. Would be an advantage to have
something like a 486 hurd box for developers?
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:05:35PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
Hi all,
Hello!
I have just upgraded me server to dual PPro so
my old one, a 486 is sitting in storage. :)
Anyway, I just looked at
http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
and there seems to be no Debian/hurd boxes for
that'd be
Hi,
I want to start this thread, because I think there is something
wrong with the GNU default login method. The question about the sense
of the login shell should maybe asked again at this time. What are
the advantages and, which is IMHO even more important, what are the
disadvantages of it?
--- Adam Majer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have just upgraded me server to dual PPro so
my old one, a 486 is sitting in storage. :)
Anyway, I just looked at
http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi
and there seems to be no Debian/hurd boxes for
developers. Would be an advantage to
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 12:07:56AM +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote:
James Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, as you previously mentioned there is no power in this login
shell so we aren't leaving open doors all over the place.
Wait. As the system is right now, there's a lot of power
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 03:04:06PM -0700, James Morrison wrote:
What do you plan on doing with 1GB of swap I have 512MB of ram and
haven't touched swap space in months.
my 64MB RAM box has 1GB of swap cause i really want to be safe. do you
mean that 512MB swap would be enough?
--
Marcus Brinkmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, because if you need a secure console (eg, if the computer is
accessible in public), you need to take a lot of extra steps anyway
to secure the machine: You need to set a BIOS and GRUB password, for
example.
Of course! Don't get me wrong, I
For the GNU system, the issue of paramount importance is that all security
decisions be a matter of local administrative choice rather than imposed by
the system. For the base installation, we use the choices that we (the
Hurd developers) like for our own machines and you don't have to like those
Marcus these are my feelings exactly. I think having to type login to
login is redundant. Just like win2k where you type ctrl-alt-del (which
according to MS improves security), before you login. I think the normal
case is logining, and that is someone wants to use some other feature with
out
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:20:59AM +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote:
Let me describe my view like this: when I ask a company to build a
house for me, I simply expect the doors to have locks, to offer at
least some kind of protection.
Well, I guess we could argue hours about this :) Like, I could
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 03:15:49AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Do we have file permission bits for the unauthentificated user?
Yes. And a bit to control if it should use those or the o bits. Currently,
the default is to use the o bits, but we are not sure if we shouldn't change
that. What you
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 05:56:20PM -0500, Adam Majer wrote:
The specs on the box are:
486DX2 66 [overclocked to 80]
20MB RAM
uhm.. you'll need a lot of swap, i suggest 1GB to be safe. :)
I could put in some clonker drives for swap to
get to 1G. Can hurd support that much swap
This is a shoes website source for importers and distributors.
www.wins-chinaboots.com
It's worth visiting this site if you are buyers.
Regards,
Wentao
17 matches
Mail list logo
