ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked a file attachment(s).
Place = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender = debian-hurd
Subject = SMARTpages.com
Delivery Time = August 21, 2002 (Wednesday) 22:13:43
Action on file attachment(s):
Delete 'Global.bat' at CustomerService
Message from recipient's administrat
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:05:05PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> > Has everything been rebuilt for libstdc++5, if not, is this likely to
> > happen in the near future?
>
> Depends on your definition of near. Not within days, but within weeks
> shoul
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
The one thing about NT's approach that I think is good is the
presence of Deny ACEs.
I feel like one can't have
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
>> Maybe I should describe what I know of the ACL's implemented on top
>> of Unix then: I had some experience with a Solaris system, and I
>> heard tha
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
ACL's (Access Control Lists, for those who haven't heard the term
before), allow the administrator to have more fine-grained control
over access to the system.
However, the only system I'm familiar with t
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:05:05PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> Has everything been rebuilt for libstdc++5, if not, is this likely to
> happen in the near future?
Depends on your definition of near. Not within days, but within weeks
should be possible.
> No great problem as far as I can see a
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:02:32PM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote:
> How do you make correct library dependencies?
Apply the patch from alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd/contrib/jbailey/
dpkg-shlibdeps has a long outstanding misbehaviour on the Hurd which was
only recently discussed with the dpkg m
How do you make correct library dependencies?
I edit file lists to include libraries found in /lib but I'd like
something automagical. Any hint where I should look?
I tried to read the dpkg manuals and search some packaging guide but found
nothing I could use.
--
Michal Suchanek
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:36:47AM +0200, Wolfgang Jährling wrote:
>
> It is so obvious that one does not want this on a "secured" system that
> one certainly won't forget to change it. Therefore, if you really want
> to improve security, you should maybe look somewhere else. According to
> the
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:36:47AM +0200, Wolfgang Jährling wrote:
> It is so obvious that one does not want this on a "secured" system that
> one certainly won't forget to change it. Therefore, if you really want
> to improve security, you should maybe look somewhere else. According to
> the BTS
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 10:25:10AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I investigated file permissions for the Hurd a couple of years ago.
> The upstream maintainer of fileutils (Michael Stone I think it was?)
> told me the Hurd shouldn't bother with the extra permission bits for
> the unauthenticate
Checking for the J2 CDs.
Has everything been rebuilt for libstdc++5, if not, is this likely to
happen in the near future?
No great problem as far as I can see as libstdc++3 and *++4 were included
in the J1 images and these could be included along with *++5.
Any other problems I should be aware o
此邮件为商业信函，如果您对此不感兴趣请立即删除；如果您不希望再收到此邮件请到http://filter.21gold.com退订，我们将会把您的邮箱地址过滤出列表。谢谢！;
This mail is a business letter. If you are uninterested in this , please delete
it immediately;If you do not hope to receive this mail again , please go to
http://filter.21gold.com ,fill in your mail address ,
此邮件为商业信函，如果您对此不感兴趣请立即删除；如果您不希望再收到此邮件请到http://filter.21gold.com退订，我们将会把您的邮箱地址过滤出列表。谢谢！;
This mail is a business letter. If you are uninterested in this , please delete
it immediately;If you do not hope to receive this mail again , please go to
http://filter.21gold.com ,fill in your mail address ,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 08:33:24AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> And only this file's ACL matters. There is no concept of
> inheritance.
Err... A slight error here. As with normal Unix permission bits, you
must have "x" permission to the directory, and its parent, and it's
parent parent, etc
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
> ACL's (Access Control Lists, for those who haven't heard the term
> before), allow the administrator to have more fine-grained control
> over access to the system.
> However, the only system I'm familiar with that uses them is Windows
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
