On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 02:32:11PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> While I happily go along with the majority, I personally think
> it would be wise for the Hurd to have an independent release cycle,
> starting at Debian GNU/Hurd 1.0, for example.
>
> 1. This would mean that different arch's woul
On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> It's not obvious to me whether we want to try to release with Sarge or
> not, but a pretty critical step in there would be to help bend the new
> installer to our needs. Is anyone interested in taking this on? I
> don't know how this would relate to any
It's not obvious to me whether we want to try to release with Sarge or
not, but a pretty critical step in there would be to help bend the new
installer to our needs. Is anyone interested in taking this on? I
don't know how this would relate to any of the work that Philip's done
with the CDs (I'm
http://www.geocities.com/alikahomapage/alika
http://www.lizaclub.da.ru
http://www.sokarim.tk
On Sun, Sep 15, 2002 at 04:04:07AM -0400, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> Here is a guide by Jeff Bailey for building an X86->Hurd cross
> compiler. The steps for arm will be similar except your target will
> be something like "arm4vl-unknown-linux-gnu" and you won't need MIG,
> gnumach, or Hurd.
> h
My apologies. Somehow I goofed up and posted this to
debian-hurd instead of debian-arm. My bad.
- Doug
B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
Hi. I have had some experience building cross-gcc compilers, and the
gist of it is using the autotools "configure" program. Now, before
you go any further, I need to conf
Hi. I have had some experience building cross-gcc compilers, and the
gist of it is using the autotools "configure" program. Now, before
you go any further, I need to confirm that you app is running arm-linux
right? (Not CE). If so, then you will be booting an arm linux kernel
and will be using the
7 matches
Mail list logo
