[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
[...]
> > cat /dev/zero > /tmp/foobar
[...]
> I don't need the anonymous account to hose your system this way.
>
> Do you log incoming network connections of any kind? Then I can fill
> up your log.
>
> This is assuming that I'm not clever eno
Hello,
has anyone of you managed to launch the One True Editor under X in
current GNU/Hurd, i.e. without "-nw"?
When I try, it gives me a "fatal error (11)" and dumps core. I've
filed a bug against emacs21 some months ago. So far there was no
response.
Am I the only one having this problem? Or i
Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >How do you access this `login' shell from remote?
> >
> > See the login> prompt when you login? That is the login shell, it is
> > just a normal shell that is running as an anonymous user (see the
But even the anonymous user can to something like
cat /dev/zero > /tmp/foobar
I don't know, if this matches your definition of "security issues" but
it's an effective way to make the box unusable.
A anonymous user has by default the same rights as "other users" if
the anonymous user
On Sun, Dec 22, 2002 at 05:45:17AM +0700, Budi Rahardjo wrote:
> > > I was thinking of creating a guest account for people to look around
> > > and get a feel of a live GNU/Hurd machine.
> >
> > As the login program is really a shell, you don't necessarily need an
> > account for guests :
>
> Oh
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>How do you access this `login' shell from remote?
>
> See the login> prompt when you login? That is the login shell, it is
> just a normal shell that is running as an anonymous user (see the
> output of ids).
>
>Is there a known security is
6 matches
Mail list logo
