Re: ssh

2003-06-29 Thread Michael Banck
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 04:14:30AM +0100, Sam Halliday wrote: > i just installed GNU K3, and using the debian install instructions > (http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-cd) i got as far as step 7 when > it exited on ssh, with something like "/usr/bin/dpkg exited with status > 1". if i run apt-ge

Re: why was um-pppd removed?

2003-06-29 Thread Neal H. Walfield
> but modern *BSDs use a kernel-space "Linux approach". are you sure > um-pppd is still maintained? Last update was on June 19, 2003 [1]. I attempted to submit my patches to Brian several times, however, I never got any type of response. [1] http://www.awfulhak.org/~brian/

Re: why was um-pppd removed?

2003-06-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 06:06:25PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > Interface compatible to what? The um-pppd package comes from BSD, and the > pfinet tunnel device is interface compatible to BSD's tunnel device. oh. I didn't know about tunnel devices; that probably confused me. > So we > alr

Re: (unknown)

2003-06-29 Thread Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 19:50:11 +0800, Tan Hao wrote: > I need your help urgently! > > Recently, I installed Red Hat 9 and use grub as the loader. So ask in a Red Hat or grup list... And please refrain from HTML. -- _ / \ Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 64

ssh

2003-06-29 Thread Sam Halliday
hello there, i just installed GNU K3, and using the debian install instructions (http://www.debian.org/ports/hurd/hurd-cd) i got as far as step 7 when it exited on ssh, with something like "/usr/bin/dpkg exited with status 1". if i run apt-get upgrade, it continually exits in the same place. has a

Re: why was um-pppd removed?

2003-06-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 07:03:52PM +0200, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > > but modern *BSDs use a kernel-space "Linux approach". are you sure > > um-pppd is still maintained? > > Last update was on June 19, 2003 [1]. I attempted to submit my > patches to Brian several times, however, I never got any t

Re: why was um-pppd removed?

2003-06-29 Thread Robert Millan
On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:00:53AM +0200, Farid Hajji wrote: > > If um-pppd is unwelcome in the debian archives, why not > add it temporarily in the hurd sources, perhaps with the > intent of turning it later into a ppp translator? sounds like a good idea; then we don't have to maintain the part