On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 07:15:02PM -0400, Max Polk wrote:
> I installed HURD from the CD's, but when booting the Hurd, I keep getting a
> kernel panic.
>
> I think I see the first module load (ex2fs.static), then I think I see the
> second module beginning to load (ld.so.1), then I get the kernel
I installed HURD from the CD's, but when booting the Hurd, I keep getting a
kernel panic.
I think I see the first module load (ex2fs.static), then I think I see the
second module beginning to load (ld.so.1), then I get the kernel panic. I
scribbled it down the best I could, it says something like
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 05:49:08PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> Fixed now. Someone should bang upstream with a large trout over this ;)
This is a typical porting problem, but you should be trouted for not having
this figured out before making the bug report ;)
> [...]
> -ifeq ($(PKG_PLATFORM),l
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 02:23:41PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>__USE_LARGEFILE64 and __USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED are *not* user macros.
>You want to use _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and _XOPEN_EXTENDED respectively.
>However, these must be defined before any includes are done and (at
>least the f
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 04:58:22PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> >As a co-author of CDBS, I can assure you that it is. =) The Hurd is
> >one of my target packages. (As is glibc/gcc and binutils)
> Great! Last time I checked it seemed to me that custom directory
> layout can't be handled (like ou
Jeff Bailey wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 09:44:44AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
I'm not sure if CDBS is enough expressive for package
like "hurd". (Debhelper is.)
As a co-author of CDBS, I can assure you that it is. =) The Hurd is one
of my target packages. (As is glibc/gcc and binutils)
Great!
Impp0ve your 1ife, with incrFasing y0ur eFrning p0wJr fr0m a dip1oma
090303242115542548981548810701311351685997451706694749620601842977145645490660230705677738822020845309958915938009576340233
within days from a n0n-accredited univeosity based on 1ife expHrience.
Ca11 anytime inc1uding ho1idays a
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 09:44:44AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> > - re-write debian/rules for easier maintainability (using CDBS).
> This is relatively low priority, wishlist. Better use your time for
> something else. I'm not sure if CDBS is enough expressive for package
> like "hurd". (Debhe
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 02:50:16PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>Upstream is the most important from my POV. I agree that the
>Debian package needs some special attention. :)
>
> Is anyone working on getting the buildd working again (Jeff?)? Cause
> it is kinda silly to have a working
Upstream is the most important from my POV. I agree that the
Debian package needs some special attention. :)
Is anyone working on getting the buildd working again (Jeff?)? Cause
it is kinda silly to have a working Debian package that isn't getting
built so that people can actually use it.
__USE_LARGEFILE64 and __USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED are *not* user macros.
You want to use _FILE_OFFSET_BITS and _XOPEN_EXTENDED respectively.
However, these must be defined before any includes are done and (at
least the former) should be done across all files. I suggest that
they be added t
tag 215153 - patch
tag 215154 - patch
thanks
Nathan, I'll provide a fixed patch in a while..
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:25:59PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 09:16:19PM +, Robert Millan wrote:
> > +#define __USE_LARGEFILE64
>
> If the two underscores are not a hint
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 09:44:44AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > - re-write debian/rules for easier maintainability (using CDBS).
>
> This is relatively low priority, wishlist. Better use your time for
> something else. I'm not sure if CDBS is enough expressive for packa
Not to bother with this, but I believe this discussion should be happening in
a wishlist bug on the BTS.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 10:55:59PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:59:12PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > > - Can
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:59:12PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
>
> And there are other bug fixes that were never reported via Debian.
> Well, some people still have problems with the console, for example.
> These problems are all fixed in CVS.
I know. But unfortunately, I can't keep track of non-
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 07:37:45PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> I'm very glad that someone decides to update the hurd package.
> Just some minor comments:
>
> * If you add yourself to Uploaders, then you become one of the maintainers
> for the Debian package. No need to call it "NMU" then.
ok
Robert Millan wrote:
- re-write debian/rules for easier maintainability (using CDBS).
This is relatively low priority, wishlist. Better use your time for
something else. I'm not sure if CDBS is enough expressive for package
like "hurd". (Debhelper is.) If you still want to do it, please
con
17 matches
Mail list logo
