Re: Building glibc 2.5 on Hurd: ``MSG_NOSIGNAL''

2007-02-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Thomas Schwinge a écrit : > Hello! > > This is not a proper fix, but a workaround that is needed on HEAD. (Have > to check glibc-2_5-branch.) Reported on > . > This workaround is also necessary for the 2.5 branch. Applied in our SVN as it seems harmless for

Re: Building glibc 2.5 on Hurd: GCC

2007-02-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Thomas Schwinge a écrit : > Hello! > > Needed because of GCC changes. Not everything is ready for upstream > inclusion. > > > This is no proper fix, but a workaround to not make argp-enabled programs > segfault on ``PROGRAM --help'' when glibc is build with GCC 4.1. > Reported on >

Re: Building glibc 2.5 on Hurd

2007-02-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > Hi all, > > I am currently trying to port the glibc 2.5 on Hurd. I am facing the > problem described here: > I am facing another problem now... sigsuspend_not_cancel is not defined for Hurd in sysdeps/mach/hurd/sigsuspend.c. This function is called from sysdeps/posix/

Re: Building glibc 2.5 on Hurd: ``__libc_once''

2007-02-08 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Thomas Schwinge a écrit : > Hello! > > Needed on glibc-2_5-branch and HEAD. Reported at > and finally on > , where it was > rejected by Ulrich Drepper. Roland wanted to have a look. > > 2006-12-18 Thomas