Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396741: fixed in gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396741: fixed in gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413185: fixed in gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#390872: fixed in gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413185: fixed in gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413177: fixed in gnumach 2:1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
gnumach-dbg_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.deb: package says section is devel,
override says libdevel.
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.deb: package says section is base,
override s
Accepted:
gnumach-dbg_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach-dbg_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.deb
gnumach-dev_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gnumach/gnumach-dev_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.deb
gnumach-udeb_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.udeb
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1.dsc
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306.orig.tar.gz
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1.diff.gz
gnumach_1.3.99.dfsg.cvs20070306-1_i386.deb
gnumach-udeb_1.3.
Hi,
I commited the fix in CVS.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> forcemerge 413185 396741
Bug#413185: When the files are downloaded with apt-get install, the system
reboots occasionally.
Bug#396741: gnumach: General protection trap on network load
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Tue 06 Mar 2007 04:03:45 +0900, a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >I don't have the time to test myself, maybe it's just completely bogus:
> >could you try, in device/net_io.c, in the net_deliver() function, to
> >move the call to net_filter() _above_
> >
> >
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
I don't have the time to test myself, maybe it's just completely bogus:
could you try, in device/net_io.c, in the net_deliver() function, to
move the call to net_filter() _above_
simple_unlock(&net_queue_lock);
(void) spl0();
And in linux/dev/glue/ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 413185 important
Bug#413185: When the files are downloaded with apt-get install, the system
reboots occasionally.
Severity set to `important' from `normal'
> merge 413185 396741
Bug#396741: gnumach: General protection trap on network load
Bug
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:20:54AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Now that I fixed kdb's trace command (2007-02-20), could you try
> reproducing it and get a trace?
I already traced it manually a while back. (Sorry for not reporting my
findings...)
It turns out the crash happens in the lin
Samuel Thibault wrote:
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Tue 06 Mar 2007 00:57:13 +0900, a écrit :
0x133dae(ff007b8,10379000,588,1,1080)
0x173b99(572c8,4,2eecf4,202,2b7480)
0x1b4b18(562c0,0,9,2eed3c,2eed8c)
0x1b557b(9,2b7480,2eed64,11f6f4,fef5ca0)
0x15a3b0(9)
0x1377f5(2edabc,1036e000,11a86ee0,1738bb,ff0
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Tue 06 Mar 2007 01:44:15 +0900, a écrit :
> $ addr2line -f -e gnumach 0x1377f5
> interrupt
> i386/i386at/interrupt.S:44
> $ addr2line -f -e gnumach 0x133dae
> net_packet
> device/net_io.c:674
> $ addr2line -f -e gnumach 0x1738bb
> device_write
> linux/dev/glue/net.c:522
That
Hi,
I don't have the time to test myself, maybe it's just completely bogus:
could you try, in device/net_io.c, in the net_deliver() function, to
move the call to net_filter() _above_
simple_unlock(&net_queue_lock);
(void) spl0();
And in linux/dev/glue/net.c, in device_write(), m
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Tue 06 Mar 2007 00:57:13 +0900, a écrit :
> >>0x133dae(ff007b8,10379000,588,1,1080)
> >>0x173b99(572c8,4,2eecf4,202,2b7480)
> >>0x1b4b18(562c0,0,9,2eed3c,2eed8c)
> >>0x1b557b(9,2b7480,2eed64,11f6f4,fef5ca0)
> >>0x15a3b0(9)
> >>0x1377f5(2edabc,1036e000,11a86ee0,1738bb,ff007b8)
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 23:48:37 +0900, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Ah, yes, the report is older than that, but let's see if fixing #396741
fixes yours.
I compiled today's CVS version with --enable-kdb, and succeeded in the
repro
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:48:37PM +0900, YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki wrote:
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Ah, yes, the report is older than that, but let's see if fixing #396741
> >fixes yours.
>
> I compiled today's CVS version with --enable-kdb, and succeeded in the
> reproduction of the phenomenon.
Exc
Hi,
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 23:48:37 +0900, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Ah, yes, the report is older than that, but let's see if fixing #396741
> >fixes yours.
> >
>
> I compiled today's CVS version with --enable-kdb, and succeeded in the
> reproduction of the phenomen
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Ah, yes, the report is older than that, but let's see if fixing #396741
fixes yours.
I compiled today's CVS version with --enable-kdb, and succeeded in the
reproduction of the phenomenon.
db>trace
0x10d577(2edabc,10379000,2eecc4,173b99,ff007b8)
0x133dae(ff007b8
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:20:54AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Now that I fixed kdb's trace command (2007-02-20),
Thanks a lot for doing that, btw.
> could you try reproducing it and get a trace?
Actually, we did (at FOSDEM), we just haven't posted it to the bug yet,
thanks for reminding.
Samuel Thibault wrote:
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 18:33:50 +0900, a écrit :
Samuel Thibault wrote:
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 17:47:17 +0900, a écrit :
The system rebooted still though I tested with not `apt-get install' but
`wget'.
It seems to be sure
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 19:00:36 +0900, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 18:33:50 +0900, a écrit :
> >
> >>Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >>
> >>>YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 17:47:17 +0900, a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>
> The
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 18:33:50 +0900, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 17:47:17 +0900, a écrit :
> >
> >>The system rebooted still though I tested with not `apt-get install' but
> >>`wget'.
> >>It seems to be sure to be a bug related t
Hi,
Samuel Thibault wrote:
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 17:47:17 +0900, a écrit :
The system rebooted still though I tested with not `apt-get install' but
`wget'.
It seems to be sure to be a bug related to communication I/O.
How fast is your network connection? There's a kn
Hi,
Now that I fixed kdb's trace command (2007-02-20), could you try
reproducing it and get a trace?
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
YAMAMOTO, Hiroyuki, le Mon 05 Mar 2007 17:47:17 +0900, a écrit :
> The system rebooted still though I tested with not `apt-get install' but
> `wget'.
> It seems to be sure to be a bug related to communication I/O.
How fast is your network connection? There's a known bug here:
http://bugs.d
Hi,
The system rebooted still though I tested with not `apt-get install' but
`wget'.
It seems to be sure to be a bug related to communication I/O.
Hiroyuki
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31 matches
Mail list logo