This bug is the only reason gnumach-dev isn't in testing:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnumach-dev
Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
explain why it should still be open.
Regards //Johan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
> Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
> explain why it should still be open.
Mmm, I'd say the explanation given by Michael still holds?
Samuel
On Wed, May 30, 2007 14:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
>> Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
>> explain why it should still be open.
>
> Mmm, I'd say the explanation given by Michael still holds?
And I'd p
Bugs item #303720, was opened at 2006-08-04 14:30
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: [test-suite] expect
Category: test suite
Group: None
Resolution: None
Initial Comment:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/build/chroot-unstable/build/buildd/expect
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:13:32 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
> > Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
> > explain why it should still be open.
>
> Mmm, I'd say the explanation given by Michael still hold
Guillem Jover, le Wed 30 May 2007 18:28:33 +0300, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:13:32 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
> > > explain why it should still be
Patches item #301614, was opened at 11/05/2005 10:40
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Christopher Bodenstein (physicman-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: FTBFS arts-1.3.2
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None
Initial Comment:
The attached patch allows to build arts
Patches item #304101, was opened at 04/03/2007 14:14
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: * #413342: gcc-4.1: hurd-i386 needs crtfm too
Category: None
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
permits to use -ffast
Patches item #301847, was opened at 28/06/2005 04:45
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #254720: FTBFS: masqmail-0.2.20
Category: build-env
Group: submitted
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese <[EMA
Patches item #302785, was opened at 25/12/2005 03:10
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #344722: opensp
Category: posix
Group: needs-work
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
Author: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: opensp
Patches item #304102, was opened at 04/03/2007 14:15
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: * #413348: [hurd-i386] xmms' OSS plugin shouldn't ship its own
soundcard.h
Category: None
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial
Patches item #303260, was opened at 20/03/2006 23:49
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #358015: xorg-server: FTBFS on non DRM capable systems
Category: None
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
FTBFS
--
Patches item #301252, was opened at 11/03/2005 19:06
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #299094: FTBFS - attr-2.4.21
Category: linuxism
Group: submitted
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese <[EMAIL P
Patches item #303223, was opened at 11/03/2006 01:29
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #356300: xserver-xorg: Hurd support for Xorg 7.0 X server
Category: None
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
works as ni
Patches item #302870, was opened at 08/01/2006 15:05
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #346447: gopher
Category: posix
Group: submitted
Resolution: None
Initial Comment:
Author: Ben Asselstine
Source: gopher
Status: Submitted (#3464
Patches item #303142, was opened at 27/02/2006 15:03
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Christopher Bodenstein (physicman-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: fcron
Category: debian
Group: unreviewed
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
Author: Christopher Bodenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Patches item #303054, was opened at 15/02/2006 19:30
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #330871: boa should check for sendfile() returning ENOSYS
Category: None
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
boa can't g
Patches item #303057, was opened at 15/02/2006 19:31
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #349204: libc0.3: mlock() fails on anything else than stack on
hurd/mach
Category: None
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comm
Patches item #304354, was opened at 20/04/2007 18:18
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #420188: glibc: bits/in.h misses IPV6_V6ONLY
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None
Initial Comment:
makes a few packages FTBFS
Patches item #303218, was opened at 10/03/2006 04:42
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gtk2-engines-2.6.7
Category: linuxism
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None
Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sou
Patches item #303224, was opened at 11/03/2006 02:11
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #345221: freesweep
Category: build-env
Group: submitted
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
Patch for kfreeBSD is already on BTS and
Patches item #303272, was opened at 23/03/2006 22:45
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: libgc-6.6
Category: build-env
Group: unreviewed
Resolution: None
Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: lib
Patches item #303331, was opened at 05/04/2006 19:22
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #358702: FTBFS: bdftopcf.1x / bdftopcf.1 confusion (gnuab)
Category: build-env
Group: submitted
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
Patches item #303688, was opened at 26/07/2006 23:22
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Cyril Brulebois (kibi-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: pciutils: FTBFS on hurd-i386: Unconditional use of MAXPATHLEN
Category: posix
Group: None
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
Hi, there
Patches item #303711, was opened at 01/08/2006 13:55
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Cyril Brulebois (kibi-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #381018: gcc-defaults: FTBFS on hurd-i386
Category: build-env
Group: submitted
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
This little patch:
-
Patches item #303734, was opened at 08/08/2006 23:22
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: clutils
Category: posix
Group: unreviewed
>Resolution: Invalid
Initial Comment:
Author: Ben Asselstine
--
Patches item #303792, was opened at 28/08/2006 04:56
>Status: Closed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Barry deFreese (bddebian-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #393829: openbsd-inetd
Category: other
Group: submitted
>Resolution: Fixed
Initial Comment:
Author: Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Patches item #304451, was opened at 31/05/2007 00:37
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Samuel Thibault (sthibaul-guest)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: #426795: libsndfile: FTBFS on hurd-i386
Category: None
Group: None
Resolution: None
Initial Comment:
ftbfs
--
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:01:32 +0200, Johan Walles wrote:
> This bug is the only reason gnumach-dev isn't in testing:
>
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnumach-dev
>
> Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
> explain why it should still be open.
T
Patches item #301303, was opened at 23/03/2005 15:20
Status: Open
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Banck (mbanck)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: gnupg (gnuab)
Category: debian
Group: needs-work
Resolution: None
Initial Comment:
Author: Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gnupg
Status
30 matches
Mail list logo
