Re: Task #272: killall implementation

Hi, - On Dec 21, 2007 12:28 AM, Shakthi Kannan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | In file included from utimecmp.c:41: | utimens.h:2: error: conflicting types for 'futimens' | /usr/local/hurd/bin/../sys_root/include/sys/stat.h:370: error: \-- Fixed:

Re: [elinks-dev] The Links/Links2/ELinks browsers are unusable on Debian GNU/Hurd

Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:50:26PM +0100, Fabienne Ducroquet wrote: On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 06:29:51AM +0200, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote: I mean, the compiler might merely have decided to load the address of free_itrm into a register at that point, or something like that. But

Re: Task #272: killall implementation

Hi, On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:54:58PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: Is someone working on killall implementation (task #272, https://alioth.debian.org/projects/debian-hurd/). Is it something small that I can start with? It's certainly not a *small* task; but probably not a very hard one.

Re: Debian GNU Hurd volunteer

Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:30:08AM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: I would like to help with the TODO tasks for Debian GNU Hurd. Are these tasks updated in savannah or any other place? Well, the Savannah task list contains tasks about the Hurd in general. Debian-specific issues are on

pthread_atfork()

Hello, At least in pike7.6, ./configure detects pthread_atfork() and then the resulting program uses it, and fails because for now our implementation is return ENOSYS; If we weren't providing the function, pike would manage to work without it. So until we have a proper implementation maybe we

Re: pthread_atfork()

On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 01:35 +, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, At least in pike7.6, ./configure detects pthread_atfork() and then the resulting program uses it, and fails because for now our implementation is return ENOSYS; If we weren't providing the function, pike would manage to