I'm really sorry to bother you again. But i'm at my wits end. I still
can't get networking up and running, basically the hurd won't recognize my
network cards. This is what i have done so far:
1.) Upgraded netdde to: netdde_0.0.20120520-2_hurd-i386.deb
2.) Compiled netdde from source. I replaced
Nicholas Bamber, le Thu 21 Jun 2012 13:04:17 +0100, a écrit :
> ++/* As per #678358, Hurd defines AF_LINK but does not
> ++ * provide the functionality. When that bug is fixed
> ++ * These three lines could be removed and #678375 closed.
> ++ */
> ++#ifdef __GNU__
> ++#undef AF_LINK
> ++#endif
I'm
On 21/06/12 11:14, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 21/06/12 08:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
>> 3.) You seem to see it fit to willfully cause an FTBS on Hurd, to make a
>> point.
>
> To willfully allow an existing FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, to become a more
> explanatory FTBFS, which would someday go away an
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 01:16 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 19:10:17 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > If there is a need to build pst2dii that .cpp-file has to be patched too
> > (not done yet). Looks like it will be enabled if the right version
> > of /usr/bin/convert
On 21/06/12 08:57, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> 3.) You seem to see it fit to willfully cause an FTBS on Hurd, to make a
> point.
To willfully allow an existing FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, to become a more
explanatory FTBFS, which would someday go away and keep the intended
functionality once the cause had bee
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # perl
> block 678376 by 678358
Bug #678376 [src:perl] src:perl: Please check use of AF_LINK with repect to Hurd
678376 was not blocked by any bugs.
678376 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 678376: 678358
> # netifaces
> block 67
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 675836 -1
Bug #675836 [src:pmacct] pmacct: FTBFS[!linux]: error: dereferencing pointer to
incomplete type
Bug 675836 cloned as bug 678375
678375 was not blocked by any bugs.
678375 was blocking: 671115
Added blocking bug(s) of 678375: 67111
On 20/06/12 22:50, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> You still didn't address that in your reply.
>
Steven,
You seem to have three issues:
1.) feature based tests rather than platform based tests.
I totally get the desirability of this. It means new OS 's or
improvements to OS's get picked up a
8 matches
Mail list logo