Paul Wise, le Wed 08 May 2013 12:06:01 +0800, a écrit :
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We haven't worked on microcode upload, since we don't necessarily target
non-freeness...
So, someday the Hurd will need support for microcode upload.
Well, I haven't said we
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 01:07:42AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Neil McGovern, le Tue 07 May 2013 11:14:01 +0100, a écrit :
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 10:27:54PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
We have not worked too much on the hardware support in the past months,
so it is basically network
Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 11:35:52 +0100, a écrit :
About disk support, I happen to have right now a few days of holiday
with no RL plans (at last!), so I'll work on the SATA driver. Having it
working within a month should just happen.
But not tested - how about USB - did that
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 04:33:03PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 11:35:52 +0100, a écrit :
But not tested - how about USB - did that ever get sorted?
We have not worked on it.
How about things like wireless drivers, raid controllers,
suspend/resume,
Neil McGovern, le Wed 08 May 2013 16:07:26 +0100, a écrit :
No, just something that works for the majority of our users. I'm fairly
sure things like SATA and USB is considered essential.
SATA, yes. USB, less.
d) VMWare/VBox etc.
This already works.
Just tried it with vbox
Sorry to clutter the mailing list.
But as a long time lurker at the mailing list I would just like to thank the
Hurd team for all your efforts!
@Samuel, I totally agree with you on your points.
I have been happily running Hurd on my (reasonably new) core 2 computer for a
year. It wasn't
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (08/05/2013):
I'm afraid I'll still not be able to explain people when they ask me
why hurd-i386 is not in testing, except vague reasons.
For the record, and speaking only for myself, I'd love to see a proper
architecture qualification process, rather than
Cyril Brulebois, le Wed 08 May 2013 17:52:13 +0200, a écrit :
Now, I think everyone having actually worked on the release would
enjoy (and probably deserve) a few days/weeks of rest before resuming
release duties, which include:
I was also thinking the same when I saw the issue popping up
On 08/05/13 16:52, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org (08/05/2013):
I'm afraid I'll still not be able to explain people when they ask me
why hurd-i386 is not in testing, except vague reasons.
For the record, and speaking only for myself, I'd love to see a proper
Steven Chamberlain, le Wed 08 May 2013 18:36:33 +0100, a écrit :
My idea would be to look at the (I estimate) 90+ packages that are
out-of-date in sid on GNU/Hurd but not other arches, and were not
already removed by #704477. This includes some important ones like
gcc-4.8, gdb.
gcc-4.8 was
On 02.05.2013 01:56, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
So, as you may have read, Debian 7.0 is to be released this week-end.
The plan was to make our own Debian-unofficial, but GNU/Hurd-official
release.
When would that one be released?
Philipp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Philipp Klaus Krause, le Wed 08 May 2013 20:12:42 +0200, a écrit :
On 02.05.2013 01:56, Samuel Thibault wrote:
So, as you may have read, Debian 7.0 is to be released this week-end.
The plan was to make our own Debian-unofficial, but GNU/Hurd-official
release.
When would that one be
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 08 May 2013 20:31:29 +0200, a écrit :
Philipp Klaus Krause, le Wed 08 May 2013 20:12:42 +0200, a écrit :
On 02.05.2013 01:56, Samuel Thibault wrote:
So, as you may have read, Debian 7.0 is to be released this week-end.
The plan was to make our own
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 08:31:29PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/tmp/README.txt
Please review and send fixes.
People may still use an old version of kvm where writeback isn't the
default, and the performance increase is important enough to directly
provide
14 matches
Mail list logo
