Re: gnome-terminal: FTBFS on kfreebsd hurd archs

2014-06-07 Thread Robert Millan
On 02/06/14 14:13, Andreas Henriksson wrote: You'd find that the default configuration is unusable under non-GNOME (and thus now for all hurd and kfreebsd users). We can't ship unusable software in Jessie. As per -release mandate kfreebsd-* is no exception anymore. It's already been

Re: please remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture

2014-06-07 Thread Robert Millan
On 02/06/14 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: May I ask what was broken on gdm3 and gnome-shell to have caused all these removals? Long-standing RC bugs in GDM3 [1], and your choice of making gnome-shell depend on it. Combined with Release Teams ruling that including GDM3 in Debian

Re: please remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture

2014-06-07 Thread Robert Millan
On 02/06/14 19:56, Steven Chamberlain wrote: We'll need to make gnome-session Architecture: linux-any and remove it. Note that it's currently Architecture: all, so I'm not sure this is necessary. AFAIK it's generally accepted to use Architecture: all for kernel-specific or cpu-specific

uninstallable on non-Linux

2014-06-07 Thread Robert Millan
Package: gnome-core Severity: serious On 02/06/14 19:56, Steven Chamberlain wrote: And I wonder if we could adjust gnome-core's dependency from: gnome-session (= 3.4), to: gnome-session (= 3.4) [linux-any], gnome-session-bin (= 3.4) [!linux-any], That would imply that gnome-core still

Re: please remove kfreebsd-any from Architecture

2014-06-07 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2014-06-07): On 02/06/14 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: May I ask what was broken on gdm3 and gnome-shell to have caused all these removals? Long-standing RC bugs in GDM3 [1], and your choice of making gnome-shell depend on it. Combined with Release

Re: GPG error after apt-get update

2014-06-07 Thread Marcelo Lacerda
I forgot to reply to the list On 06/04/14 09:15, Marcelo Lacerda wrote: Nope, and I couldn't upgrade it, I guess thats due to apt not trusting the package list in the first place. I had to manually download and install the package to make apt work again. Is this the standard procedure? On