[ With my debian-ports admin hat ]
On 2015-05-04 11:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum (2015-05-04):
> > I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
> > in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
> > other teams. I'm not entirely clea
+++ Samuel Thibault [2015-05-05 09:17 +0200]:
> * Getting binNMUs from d-release transitions
>
> This saves porters a lot of tedious work that would otherwise be just
> duplicated. We are not talking about fine-grain binNMUs here, but
> coarse-grain well-known planned binNMUs. Wanna-build supports
Richard Braun, le Tue 05 May 2015 12:27:10 +, a écrit :
> On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:36:57PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Given that the package coverage of the Hurd continuously increased and
> > that it just released 0.6 of its core components[1] along with releasing
> > Debian GNU
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:21:00PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
> Really?! So Hurd actually has a sufficient number of developers
> worldiwde?! And if Devuan is so welcome and Debian so hostile, more
> power to them, I just don;t know what are you waiting here and
> polluting our ML with toxic tone
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:36:57PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Given that the package coverage of the Hurd continuously increased and
> that it just released 0.6 of its core components[1] along with releasing
> Debian GNU/Hurd[2], this strikes me as an odd time to throw the Hurd off
> ftp
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> [Speaking for the debian-hurd team]
>
> Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 04 May 2015 08:28:22 +0200, a écrit :
> > Maybe it's just about supporting and advertising debian-ports as
> > Debian's official way to host second-class architectures.
Am Montag, 20. April 2015, 00:22:08 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
> hurd-i386
> =
> Well before wheezy was released, we talked with the HURD porters, and
> they agreed to re-check their archive status just after the wheezy
> release[1]. The plan was to move the HURD port off ftp-master if it
> was
On 05/05/15 at 09:17 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> * Appearing on packages' and maintainers' PTS
> pages like http://buildd.debian.org/bash and
> https://buildd.debian.org/sthiba...@debian.org
>
> * Being considered as "second-class citizen"
Note that our developer dashboards (DDPO, Tracker, DM
[Speaking for the debian-hurd team]
Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 04 May 2015 08:28:22 +0200, a écrit :
> Maybe it's just about supporting and advertising debian-ports as
> Debian's official way to host second-class architectures. Maybe
> there's more to it. What are the current downsides of moving hurd-
9 matches
Mail list logo
