Hi,
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
> > Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes
> > try the attached patch please?
Christoph Egger wrote:
> Start 284: RunCMake.Configure
> 284/371 Test #284: RunCMake.Configure
>
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes
>> try the attached patch please?
>
> Here's how to run that test on its own, verbosely, in an already-built
> Debian build tree:
>
> $
Hi
FWIW on the 3.2 build (with the patch) I started untill I noticed it
wasn't quite the right version
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> 292 - RunCMake.Configure (Failed)
>
> Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes
> try
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes
> try the attached patch please?
Here's how to run that test on its own, verbosely, in an already-built
Debian build tree:
$ Build/bin/cmake "-DCMAKE_MODULE_PATH=Tests/RunCMake"
Hi,
Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> 292 - RunCMake.Configure (Failed)
Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes
try the attached patch please?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--- a/Tests/RunCMake/Configure/RunCMakeTest.cmake
+++
Hi,
Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The following tests FAILED:
> 113 - BuildDepends (Failed)
I finally figured this out!
The BuildDepends test will fail when run on a filesystem not having
sub-second granularity. So for example, it fails on kfreebsd UFS, and
whatever filesystem the hurd-i386
6 matches
Mail list logo