On 3/06/2016 10:38 p.m., David Kalnischkies wrote:
>
> btw: I just checked: I introduced the first of the two finds (which is
> the more obvious problem as that codepath is used more) on 7 Jul 2015
> (25f27319) [the other is 6 Dec 2015], so that problem isn't recent but
> lingers there since 1.1
Steven Chamberlain:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state
>> in Debian.
>> We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox,
>> Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to name
See
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/173/
and
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/173//console
and
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/173//artifact/results/
if there are
Hi,
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 13:26 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> sh4:
>
>
> The two biggest issues with sh4 are currently with binutils and the
> kernel. binutils has problems when building Qt5:
>
There is in fact another big elephant in the room, which I have
mentioned several
thanks to everyone explaining arch:any to me :)
--
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I have invested lots of time and effort to get sparc64 into a usable state in
> Debian.
> We are close to 11.000 installed packages. Missing packages include Firefox,
> Thunderbird/Icedove, golang and LibreOffice to name the most important ones.
Is there
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
> Hi Niels!
>
> On 06/05/2016 12:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Beyond mips64el, we are not aware of any new architectures for Stretch.
>>
>> I kindly ask you to:
>>
>> * Porters, please assert if your architecture is targeting Stretch.
>
> To give some insight what's
On 05/06/16 13:00, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
ppc64:
This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have
over
11.000 packages installed
[...]
sparc64:
We are close to 11.000
On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> ppc64:
>>
>> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We
>> have over
>> 11.000 packages installed
> [...]
>> sparc64:
>> We are close to
On 06/05/2016 02:00 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'm not sure whether you are talking about source or binary packages but
> sid/amd64 has over 24000 source packages and over 5 binary packages,
> so I would call the above "on par". Or what am I missing?
There are just around 12,000 source
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:26:39PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> ppc64:
>
> This architecture is basically on par with the release architectures. We have
> over
> 11.000 packages installed
[...]
> sparc64:
> We are close to 11.000 installed packages.
I'm not sure whether you are
Hi Niels!
On 06/05/2016 12:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Beyond mips64el, we are not aware of any new architectures for Stretch.
>
> I kindly ask you to:
>
> * Porters, please assert if your architecture is targeting Stretch.
To give some insight what's happening in Debian Ports. We have two
Hello,
Samuel Thibault, on Sat 04 Jun 2016 18:40:26 +0200, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on Sat 04 Jun 2016 17:50:42 +0200, wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, on Fri 03 Jun 2016 20:45:15 +0200, wrote:
> > > Anyway, let's just fix this.
> >
> > It seems to be a bug when calling poll on an FD which has never
Hi members of DSA, Security, RT and all porters.
While the freeze still seem far away, I think it is time to start with
the architecture qualifications.
For starters, here are the architectures we are aware of:
* amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el,
s390x
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
