On 09/23/2016 03:54 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> No, you are not maintaining powerpcspe as a release architecture, and that's
> something different than building packages for some of the ports
> architectures.
> If you can get powerpcspe accepted as a release architecture, then maybe you
> gain som
On 20.09.2016 23:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>- powerpc: No porter (RM blocker)
>
> I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm already
> maintaining powerpcspe which is very similar to powerpc.
No, you are not maintaini
See
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/229/
and
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/229//console
and
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/229//artifact/results/
if there are an
3 matches
Mail list logo