Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-10-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 15:48 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 10/01/2016 02:17 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > > > This isn't the case for PowerPC32 where upstream development is still very > > > active because it's part of the PowerPC kernel which is maintained by > > > IBM. > >

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-10-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 22:34 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On 09/30/2016 09:04 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > > As for "porter qualification" > > = > > > > We got burned during the Jessie release, where a person answered the > > roll call for sparc and we

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-10-01 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 02:28 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:01:55PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: [...] > > I have not heard from the ppc64el porters, but I suspect ppc64 will > > not be a release arch. So you need to take into consideration that for > > powerpc to

Still Failing: g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/233

2016-10-01 Thread jenkins
See https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/233/ and https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/233//console and https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/233//artifact/results/ if there are

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

2016-10-01 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:01:55PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz >> wrote: >> [...] >> > On the other hand, some packages