Re: Porting the Hurd to L4 (glibc dependencies, dropping glibc?)

2000-11-02 Thread Ad Buijsen
ation. This scenario is almost certainly far too simple; I would be happy to discuss this further in a more suitable list. If one has already been decided on, please tell me where and how to subscribe. Ad Buijsen

Re: [Hurd-alpha-devel] Re: L4 instead of gnumach?

2000-11-02 Thread Ad Buijsen
that > increasing this limit by one, two or three powers of two may be > possible. But as you put it, a L4 guru should speak here! > Those gurus can be found on the L4 hackers list. 64 Threads and 128 taskslooks like an implementation for embedded systems. Ad Buijsen

Re: [Hurd-alpha-devel] Re: L4 instead of gnumach?

2000-10-30 Thread Ad Buijsen
d planning, and may well need redesign of important parts of the HURD to result in something that is as fast as is expected. Still, it is an interesting project. Cordially, Ad Buijsen

Re: Debian GNU/HURD for Alpha?

2000-07-19 Thread Ad Buijsen
hould be fairly easy to get > the rest to work. There is interest from others to port, but none seem > to have gone further then an inquiry. > > Did I get all the above correct? > I think so. The non-progress seems to me to be mainly caused by the fact that the Alpha is a little-used architecture. It's just too bloody expensive... Cordially, Ad Buijsen