Re: Arch qualification for buster: call for DSA, Security, toolchain concerns

[Oy vey, crosspost list from hell -- not sure how to trim...] On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:46:21PM +0100, Gregor Riepl wrote: > I do think this just reinforces the point that second-class architectures > should have better, more robust support from the Debian project. > For example, arch-specific

Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 05:54:34PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > SysV init leaves all the really hard problems to these, as it cannot > > really do much by itself. That's a fact that people that keep yelling > > "but SysV init was so easy!" keep finessing.. > > Absolutely. And the

Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:47:36PM +0800, Benda Xu wrote: > Thorsten Glaser writes: > > … this applies to the shim only. I was a bit surprised seeing on > > someone else’s system that it was no longer installable, but almost > > all systemd-free systems of people I know do not use the shim

Re: Debian Buster release to partially drop non-systemd support

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 04:18:57PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Matthew Vernon wrote: > > >I'm aware of some work ongoing at the moment to try and improve matters > >(currently looking at elongind, for example). If anyone's got some > > What’s elongind? elogind? Never heard of it… elogind is

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:01:55PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz > wrote: > [...] > > On the other hand, some packages dropped support for PowerPC32 like Mono > > but this isn't a concern for most users,

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:03:47AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > [Let's assume that we can't find a powerpc porter in time for Stretch.] Two potential porters stepped up, who might or might not be accepted. > 1. Will `powperpc` automatically be downgraded to simple port ? Or is > this also

Re: Bug#826043: apt: gpg validation fails on hurd

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:25:45PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 01:13 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > So, to summarize, the issue is that since apt-get update runs find as a > > non-root user, running it from a 700 directory breaks find. > > Thank you for the root

Bug#826043: apt: gpg validation fails on hurd

Package: apt Version: 1.2.12 Severity: important Despite all the relevant keys being installed (debian-archive-keyring, debian-ports-archive-keyring; "apt-key list" says they're there), I get: W: GPG error: http://ftp.ports.debian.org/debian-ports unreleased InRelease: The following signatures

Re: [dd-list] Please use Architecture: linux-any

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 01:11:40AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Just a heads-up about Architecture: linux-any. The dd-list below is a (non-exhaustive!) list of packages that kfreebsd/hurd maintainers believe are candidates for using it in their debian/control file, because they are