Re: How to identify "running on a Hurd system"?

2017-08-25 Thread Budi Rahardjo
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Narcis Garcia wrote: > ... > $ uname -s > Should not return "GNU" > ... +1 from me :) $ uname -s GNU/Hurd would be a better choice. for me, at least. There would be other OS(es): GNU/Linux GNU/[future-OS] GNU/BRIoTos (maybe I'll ended

Re: Text install does not boot

2017-07-04 Thread Budi Rahardjo
I get what Narcis Garcia means by versioning. If I want to report a problem, what do I tell/mention what my version is? We may have different versions. Do we all have to have the same version? Having a different version would be easier to "debug" :) But then again, maybe we are just a small

Re: Hello World!!

2016-05-22 Thread Budi Rahardjo
I still have 32-bit machines. They need OS too, you know :) Currently, running (old) Linux Debian. Cheers ... -- budi

Re: heads up

2005-03-19 Thread Budi Rahardjo
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:37:53 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are two or three people actually involved in making the GNU system. And you are not included in that list sadly. :-) Wow! GNU System is done by two/three people only. Great... Could you name those two or three

Re: heads up

2005-03-19 Thread Budi Rahardjo
Okay. We have seen arguments/point of views from both (many?) sides. The readers are smart enough to make their own judgment/decision. Now, it is time to move on. Shall we? Keep up the good work, folks. -- budi, trying to find a machine to install GNU/Hurd again... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Debian GNU/Hurd on the net?

2002-12-21 Thread Budi Rahardjo
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 11:08:03AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: I hope you have it cut off from the rest of your LAN, physically or at least through a restrictive firewall. Don't keep precious data on that machine, and reinstall before using it for other than demonstrating purposes. Thanks

Debian GNU/Hurd on the net?

2002-12-20 Thread Budi Rahardjo
At the risk of being silly, I put our GNU/Hurd box on the Internet. http://hurd.indocisc.com Please don't hurd it. :) If the system is unreachable, it could be that the machine is down. (Lately it has been acting up, dropping into root prompt asking for fsck.) I was thinking of creating a

mailing list admin-stuff (was: Re: ssh, /dev/urandom)

2002-12-18 Thread Budi Rahardjo
Folks, could you just use debian-hurd@lists.debian.org when replying? ie you don't have to add my name (or other people) in the Bcc: We are all subscribers of the list. I've been getting multiple copies. Once or twice is ok, but too many of them is annoying :( [ps: I am not the admin of this

Re: ssh, /dev/urandom

2002-12-18 Thread Budi Rahardjo
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 12:54:17AM +0100, Ga?l Le Mignot wrote: No, we should use a random translator, which, at least, provide uniform numbers, and differents number on successive reads. I have not heard argument(s) against this. Has anybody looked at kilobug's (Ga?l Le Mignot) random

senmdail compiles clean (was: Re: creating debian packages )

2002-12-18 Thread Budi Rahardjo
On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 02:30:21PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 05:24:40AM +0700, Budi Rahardjo wrote: PS: is there anybody working on sendmail package? it compiles clean under GNU/Hurd. Last I checked there were several dependencies that did not compile cleanly

Re: senmdail compiles clean (was: Re: creating debian packages )

2002-12-18 Thread Budi Rahardjo
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:45:14PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: Debian never was ported to a system that embeds such information directly into the filesystem, so it is no wonder that it doesn't support that right now, but it is clearly superior to setting it at every boot (reducing start up

Re: ssh, /dev/urandom

2002-12-18 Thread Budi Rahardjo
Why do I feel like repeating this old mantra: Bad security is worse than no security. which one would you prefer? telnet or ssh (with weak encryption) -- budi -- http://budi.insan.co.id

tcpdump - live packet capture not supported

2002-12-18 Thread Budi Rahardjo
hurd:~/src/tcpdump-3.7.1# ./tcpdump -i eth0 tcpdump: live packet capture not supported on this system any pointers? explanation? -- budi -- http://budi.insan.co.id

creating debian packages (was: Re: ssh, /dev/urandom)

2002-12-17 Thread Budi Rahardjo
Ok. We all have read views from both sides. Let's stop the flames. I guess most of you work on the GNU/Hurd in front of consoles, thus have no problem having no ssh (or assume that people could install it themselves). Fair enough... Now, could somebody point a quick tutorial (for impatient

ssh, /dev/urandom (was: Re: K1 images - final report?)

2002-12-16 Thread Budi Rahardjo
I support the addition of ssh, *even* with a weak random. The problem is, without ssh ... I would have to resort to telnet. I have to manage/operate/update our GNU/hurd through network and I am assuming many are in the same situation. Weak ssh is better than telnet. Having a minimal clothes is

Re: K1 images - final report?

2002-12-15 Thread Budi Rahardjo
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 12:46:38AM +1300, Philip Charles wrote: ... A file-system corrupting bug has emerged. The work-round I have employed is to kill the cdrom translator at the end of each installation script. I suspect that it has something to do with update, find or whatever thinking

milis, MAXHOSTNAMELEN, networking reading...

2002-12-01 Thread Budi Rahardjo
Questions: 1. what's the difference between these two milis (mailing lists)? - debian-hurd@lists.debian.org - help-hurd@gnu.org the type of msg is similar. Should I crosspost? 2. where should MAXHOSTNAMELEN be defined in the include files netdb.h ? and what's the value? 64? (i