Re: ssh, /dev/urandom

2002-12-19 Thread Emile van Bergen
Well, it's definitely useful in scenarios where you want to give your message to two messengers, that are not allowed to know the contents when they're separate; only when they come together will the plaintext be available. Effectively you split the message in two parts, each of which is

Re: mkfs and fsck in /sbin

2002-11-11 Thread Emile van Bergen
on other UNIXs they are not, would not run directly on the > other UNIXs, making Hurd a bad development platform. > b) If Hurd is used as a learning tool then the more conformance to the > detail of FHS the better. I completely agree to your suggestion and all your points. Cheers, E

Re: mkfs and fsck in /sbin

2002-11-11 Thread Emile van Bergen
always put /sbin in the system-wide path. It has no consequences for security, and on some systems, even tools such as ping are there. Having a symlink definitely makes sense for the Hurd, and shows that /any/ tool may be useful for the user, regardless of his permission level. It just depends o

Re: first contact

2002-10-28 Thread Emile van Bergen
fort to adhere to standards, even if that means better interoperability with non-free software. That's sane policy, IMHO. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info pgpj36QX8WzV0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: facelift! check it out!

2002-08-28 Thread Emile van Bergen
conventional > Darwin's theory of 'survival of the fittest' to the core. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info

SPAM prevention (was Re: Nice web page templates here. Check it out!)

2002-08-05 Thread Emile van Bergen
reputation should be used. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info

Re: Which packages should I use?

2002-07-24 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:52:56PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > That's not what is meant; if it were so, it would indeed seem redundant. > > There is no GNU version of Linux or the Hurd. GNU/X refers to the

Re: Which packages should I use?

2002-07-24 Thread Emile van Bergen
a lot. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
On 22 May 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Agreed. It's just a pity that the FHS will probably soon have added > > /hurd without anybody ever having thought about some good, *general* > > criteria when to ad

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
can't explain it in simple terms, you don't understand it properly. Thats a shame for a primary author. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
On 22 May 2002, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Emile van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > "When do you think, *in general*, that new directories under / > > *should* be created?" > > I think the answer to this question is: When FHS indicates they

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:58:18PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > But while we're sticking to the FHS' *spirit* of {/,/usr}/bin as a > > gathering place of *all* executables that can be useful to users, > > The F

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:30:20AM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > But I have a lot more trouble accepting false arguments, stated in a bit > > arrogant, matter of fact way, backed up by little else but tradition and > &g

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
On 22 May 2002, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > * Emile van Bergen writes: > > On Wed, 22 May 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > >> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 04:43:44PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: > >> I thank you for your opinion on this, but we really have to move on. >

Re: A bin for every program and every program in the bin. Oh--except...

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:58:18PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > > > Unix has something very similar: the ability to pass down an open > > file descriptor. But nobody's arguing that Debian should have all > > i

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 04:43:44PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > I'm essentially asking the question: are those 'normal' programs indeed > > normal programs, in the sense of some image that is loaded or mapped >

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi, On Wed, 22 May 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 02:31:56PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 May 2002, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > > > 'You don't want them to be visible in /bin because running them on the > >

Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
or those programs from /lib/ld.so to /bin/ld.settrans, and make the new settrans take and remove its own arguments from the argv supplied to the translator. This may be a wild idea though, but hey. Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153

Re: where do NEW packages go?

2002-05-22 Thread Emile van Bergen
of modeling the world, you'll never learn a thing that doesn't fit the model, nor will your model ever advance. Essentially, that's the same thing you asked that from the Debian group (albeit not too politely). So, it's only reasonable that you do so as well. Cheers, Emile.

User-mode drivers (was: Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?)

2002-04-17 Thread Emile van Bergen
ure that must have been considered before - it's probably not exactly trivial because of the difference in execution environments... but a lot of that has been studied for OSKit itself as well as far as I know...? Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +3

Re: GNUmach kernel parameters?

2002-04-17 Thread Emile van Bergen
y it's proprietary as hell. Just my (offtopic) 2c... Cheers, Emile. -- E-Advies / Emile van Bergen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] tel. +31 (0)70 3906153| http://www.e-advies.info -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]