Hi Samuel and Kalle,
I am looking at old rc bugs in order to clean up the archive and ran
into this bug.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 12:42:57AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, on Mon 19 Sep 2016 01:29:17 +0300, wrote:
> > Until that is implemented, the partition-table support i
Hi Dom,
I am checking old rc bugs in unstable to see whether affected packages
should be removed and this bug popped up.
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:13:47PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> I'm going to create more specific bugs per test failure in the perl
> soon, and then those can be reassign
Source: gnumach
Version: 2:1.8+git20240714-1
Tags: ftbfs
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Samuel et al,
you recently asked me to look into your proposed change
e9d733e62a47ce2ce8bc2101cad21647ce5ae81c to rebootstrap.git. Thanks for
your contribution and your patience with me. I l
Hi Martin-Éric,
On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 08:32:55AM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> This patch includes a Build-Depends on systemd. Without [linux-any],
> it will prevent building on non-Linux ports.
You raise an important matter. Basically, the only remaining non-linux
port is hurd at this tim
Hi Samuel,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:01:36AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Mmm, it still targets hurd- explicitly, so I'd say it should still
> be called mig-x86-64-gnu.
I can relate to that, yes.
> What I'm wondering is why we added -linux/-kfreebsd since here they are
> host, not target. Th
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi Guillem,
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 12:45:57PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Just to spell out, what might perhaps be obvious here, but I think
> they key is that MIG is "kernel independent", so it provides an
> interface which is none- which means it can be used on an
Package: mig-for-host
Version: 1.8+git20200618-9
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Samuel,
I'm quite surprised about the existence of mig-for-host:amd64 and
mig-x86-64-linux-gnu. I'm also a little little surprised about
mig:amd64. Are you sure that these are correct? I think none
Source: p11-kit
Version: 0.23.22-1
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-hurd@lists.debian.org
p11-kit fails to build from source on hurd-any. The immediate reason is
an undefined macro SIZE_MAX in p11-kit/lists.c. It happens that this
file fails to #include , which i
Hi Samuel,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 07:25:41PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> We now have the cross-mig packages in the archive, and I have uploaded
> gnumach & hurd to build-depend mig-for-host instead of mig.
Thank you for working on this. When you talk about cross toolchains,
please Cc debian-
Source: hurd
Version: 1:0.9.git20200416-2
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Samuel,
in the stage3 -> stage2 rename, another mistake crept in. You also moved
some headers around. In doing so, you had to split up the match for
usr/include and one of the resulting match i
Hi Samuel,
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 01:45:04PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I don't think there is any need for a smooth transition. We should go
> the most efficient path as both hurd and rebootstrap are understaffed.
> To me that seems to be:
> * I attempt to simplify the
Hi Samuel,
Thank you for the quick reply.
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:43:05PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> And the hurd port is tested there as well, so it should be working.
Right. We should aim to reproduce what is done there to minimize the
chance of failures and regressions.
> It seems to
Hi,
I intend to simplify the toolchain bootstrap for rebootstrap and this
has consequences for hurd.
The current linux/glibc toolchain bootstrap essentially works like this:
* cross binutils
* linux-libc-dev
* gcc stage1 cross compiler (baremetal)
* glibc stage1 (headers + stub libc.so)
* gc
Package: debhelper
Version: 10.7.2
File: /usr/bin/dh_install
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Control: affects -1 + src:gnumach
I noticed that cross building a gnumach stage1 for hurd-i386 started to
fail. Sucessful log:
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/rebootstrap_hurd-i386_gcc7/7/co
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 03:49:51PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Matthias Klose dixit:
>
> >I would like to see some partial test rebuilds (like buildd or minimal chroot
>
> Haven???t tried yet, but Helmut Grohne does automated rebootstrapping of
> some ports using what he
15 matches
Mail list logo
