On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Sean Neakums wrote:
> That came from the Orange Book security guidelines, I believe. The
> idea is that the SAS (secure attention sequence) is not overrideable
> and thus the user can be sure that once the sequence has been entered
> he is communicating with the OS and not
Marcus these are my feelings exactly. I think having to type login to
login is redundant. Just like win2k where you type ctrl-alt-del (which
according to MS improves security), before you login. I think the normal
case is logining, and that is someone wants to use some other feature with
out log
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 09:27:32AM -0700, James Morrison wrote:
>
> >> The only a bit tricky thing I had to do is download the packages that
> >> are one alpha.gnu.org, but required by cross-install, by hand, and put
> >> them in partial/
>
> > I
Hey Russ, I see you on plug a lot.
I think there is something on the debian site that says apt disagrees with
some harddrives. If I recall the fix was to delete the cache for apt and
basically restart the apt-get again from scratch. Look at the debian site
and you should be able to find exact de
My long running theory about this is that people crave a shorter
colloquial(sp?) term for talking about both linux and hurd. If I were
talking about them in the official sense I would try to use GNU/Hurd, or
GNU/Linux, but in conversations it seems awkward. And how many non-GNU
versions of linux
I have some questions similar to K. Bradford's questions. I, too am new
to hurd.
Currently is there any documentation available specifically for people new
to the hurd? I feel like I should read some sort of intro to hurd
development. I have found a little bit of documentation on the subject,
b
6 matches
Mail list logo
