Re: libjxl: FTBFS because of timeout in test

Hi, On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 10:41 AM Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hello, > > Mathieu Malaterre, le jeu. 10 nov. 2022 08:17:59 +0100, a ecrit: > > libjxl is currently in FTBFS state: > > > > * > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=jpeg-xl=hurd-i386

libjxl: FTBFS because of timeout in test

[cc me please] Dear hurd porters, libjxl is currently in FTBFS state: * https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=jpeg-xl=hurd-i386=0.7.0-5=1664979667=0 libjxl is supposed to build & run on all x86 system out there (portable c++ code). Please advise on best solution to work around the

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 2:28 AM, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 11:01:55PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz >> <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> [...] >

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Adrian, On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 10:34 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: [...] > On the other hand, some packages dropped support for PowerPC32 like Mono > but this isn't a concern for most users, I would say. [...] Thanks very much for stepping up as porter, you

Re: Porter roll call for Debian Stretch

Hi all, On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 20.09.2016 23:46, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> On 09/20/2016 11:16 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: >>>- powerpc: No porter (RM blocker) >> >> I'd be happy to pick up powerpc to keep it for Stretch. I'm

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

Hi Hector, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Hector Oron wrote: [...] > While working out ArchitectureQualification/Stretch wiki page I > believe everything is mostly fine for release, however I got a > personal concern on powerpc architecture. Is it well maintained? Does >

Lz4Compression.cpp:53: undefined reference to `LZ4_uncompress'

[CC me please] Hi there, I am trying to diagnose #751227 from over here. It does not make much sense to me. I cannot even see the setting for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS (does it contains parallel option?). As far I understand (unless lines are out of order), gcc/hurd is failing on a `gcc -c` compilation

error: 'inet_addr' was not declared in this scope

[CC me please] Hi all, I am trying to fix the latest gdcm upload. It currently fails on hurd-i386 with: gdcmULConnectionInfo.cxx:73:61: error: 'inet_addr' was not declared in this scope ref: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gdcmarch=hurd-i386ver=2.2.0-7stamp=1332169758 Since

Re: GCC-4.5 as the default for (at least some) architectures

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Konstantinos Margaritis mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote: On 26 April 2011 18:03, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote: I'll make GCC 4.6 the default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc. Could you