8<
Because you already said that ipchains is fine with you, I was reasonably
sure that it would be good enough from your point of view, although with
my GNU/Hurd developer hat on I am totally opposed to doing this.
This is because this will make Debian GNU/Hurd incompatible with
GNU/Hurd, and this
Firewalling serves the purpose only of covering holes that shouldn't
be there in the first place.
i would agree with you on that, and in an ideal world, of course, I would consider
firewalling to be a complete waste of time. However, those holes that "shouldn't be
there" often, unfortunately, ar
My experience shows that one can live
happily without firewalling support
And you consider your experience representative of many users needs, which
of course it is if the Hurd is to be used by people linking 2 laptops together
at home using PLIP. I, however, had hoped for bigger things.
--
To
To be honest, the only kind of "firewalling" I do at home is NAT, and I
could live without that.
So, here am I, seriously considering firewalling tools less than
essential.
Great, another compelling reason to ditch firewalling support.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
4 matches
Mail list logo
