what up dude
This might give people a laugh... here's what the Babelfish gives:
"Hurd: What for a long time lasts, becomes infinitely good?"
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Wolfgang will deliver a general Hurd talk, which would fit even
better on the web page. He will be speaking at 15:00 on Friday,
June 25th (in
tly appreciated.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
___
/ |
/ Tom Hart
ian GNU/Hurd from CD-ROM, as it explains the parts
installation process taken care of by the Debian CD-ROMS, and will help
you understand your new Debian GNU/Hurd system.
--
Tom Hart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
[Lionel Elie Mamane campaigns against deny-ACEs,
arguing that using them is dumb]
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 03:05:20PM -0500, Tom Hart responds:
Ok, continuing with your example: I'm a plotter. The sysadmin gives all
employees and board members access t
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:29:04AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
The one thing about NT's approach that I think is good is the
presence of Deny ACEs.
I feel like one
Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
ACL's (Access Control Lists, for those who haven't heard the term
before), allow the administrator to have more fine-grained control
over access to the system.
However, the only system I'
uld show the whole
ACL, only an "abstract" of it. And the mapping into Unix permission
bits is a good candidate. Obviously, you need *another* program that
shows the whole ACL.
I agree. This abstraction could come from the translation library
mentioned above.
-- Tom Hart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:28:07AM -0500, Tom Hart wrote:
I assume that the Hurd is sticking with the traditional UN*X model
because most sysadmins who are used to UNIX will find this easier to
work with. Furthermore, switching to an ACL-based model would probably
break
of work porting existing programs that depend on the UN*X
security model.
Of course, the flexibility of the Hurd should make it easier to build
ACLs into the GNU system at some point in the future, should the need
for them arise. (Can anyone with more experience than me comment on this?)
-- Tom Hart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo
