Re: Maybe helping again?

n try to get involved again (if you'll have me > or even remember me :) ). First thing is I need to get my DD account > fixed and do quite a bit of re-learning but I'm hoping I can add some > value some day. > > Hope you all are well! > > Barry deFreese > > -- William ML Leslie

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, 5:21 pm Helmut Grohne, wrote: > Package: mig-for-host > Version: 1.8+git20200618-9 > User: helm...@debian.org > Usertags: rebootstrap > > Hi Samuel, > > I'm quite surprised about the existence of mig-for-host:amd64 and > mig-x86-64-linux-gnu. I'm also a little little

Re: [VULN 4/4] Process auth man-in-the-middle

On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 22:17, Sergey Bugaev wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 1:41 PM Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > > > William ML Leslie, le ven. 05 nov. 2021 21:18:50 +1100, a ecrit: > > > > which makes the root filesystem reauthenticate all of the >

Re: [VULN 4/4] Process auth man-in-the-middle

On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 at 21:41, Samuel Thibault wrote: > William ML Leslie, le ven. 05 nov. 2021 21:18:50 +1100, a ecrit: > > > which makes the root filesystem reauthenticate all of the > > > processes file descriptors. > > > > It seems to eliminate a rathe

Re: [VULN 4/4] Process auth man-in-the-middle

ng access to that one resource. I realise you can still do this by manipulating ports directly (this only applies specifically to the contents of the descriptor table). Is it required for posix compliance somehow, or was there some other interesting use case? -- William ML Leslie

Re: Netsurf build failure: 'PATH_MAX' undeclared

On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, 6:13 am Samuel Thibault, wrote: > It's not because something is economical that one should want to do it. > > You don't even seem to realize that defining PATH_MAX *does* pose > problem, notably with the actual semantic of realpath(), due to the > semantic that posix

Re: Still Failing: g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/379

Volume group "jenkins01" has insufficient free space (1503 extents): 2560 required. On 3 July 2017 at 20:43, wrote: > See https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_ > sid_daily_hurd_lxde/379/ and https://jenkins.debian.net/ >

Re: Failure: g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/316

How do we read this, anyway? Is it hanging on reboot? On 26 February 2017 at 02:00, wrote: > See > https://jenkins.debian.net/job/g-i-installation_debian_sid_daily_hurd_lxde/316/ > and >

Re: Bradesco Saúde - Dicas para um Carnaval mais saudável

Spam. Sometimes it slips through. On 24 February 2017 at 22:39, Danial Behzadi wrote: > > What's this? > > در ۲۴ فوریهٔ ۲۰۱۷ ۸:۱۵:۰۲ (GMT+03:30)، > "brade...@campanhas.bradescoseguros.com.br" > نوشت: >> >> Page 1 >> A Bradesco

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

In case it isn't clear, the number of users of the architecture is not part of the qualification, it is the amount of maintenance pressure involved. Package maintainers have to put more effort into ensuring builds succeed for release architectures, which detracts from other work that needs to be

Re: Hello World!!

On 22 May 2016 at 12:58, Gage Morgan wrote: > Hello Alejandro, > > I'm not new to Debian, matter of fact I've been using the Linux-based > variant for quite some time. But the Linux kernel and the HURD kernel are > two very different beasts. I need to know how to get a

Re: PATCH: Hurd FTBFS with perl 5.22

On 5 January 2016 at 16:56, Svante Signell wrote: > BTW: Why does Hurd contain such crappy dependencies such as perl. Is this part > of upstream or Debian specific? The Debian package does not have it: > apt-cache showsrc hurd | grep Build-Depends | grep -i perl > > Is

Re: Leaving the Debian GNU/Hurd packaging team

On 6 March 2014 13:47, Guillem Jover guil...@debian.org wrote: Hi! I've been progressively scaling down my involvement in Debian (due to continued dissatisfaction with the project), and given that I've not been very active maintaining GNU/Hurd packages since the switch of the packaging to

Re: Imminent Debian GNU/Hurd release

On 2 May 2013 09:56, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org wrote: wheesid was suggested at some point ;) +1 I was going to suggest 'Janie', but GNU (/Hurd) isn't the chimera. -- William Leslie Notice: Likely much of this email is, by the nature of copyright, covered under copyright law.

Re: Install issues

On 18 March 2011 16:17, David Hiran Watson hiranwat...@gmail.com wrote: Any suggestions on alternative methods of install? I could try crosshurd (as I have a Debian Linux vm), or one of the ISOs. I'm not sure how old they are though, but if I'll at least get a base system running, I can use