hero...@gentoo.org, le Mon 26 Aug 2013 14:07:57 +0900, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault writes:
> > hero...@gentoo.org, le Sat 24 Aug 2013 18:31:15 +0900, a écrit :
> >> Why are you bonded to dhclient? How about dhcpd? Why are you bonded to
> >> ifupdown? How about a reduced helper than only sets a sta
Samuel Thibault writes:
> hero...@gentoo.org, le Sat 24 Aug 2013 18:31:15 +0900, a écrit :
>> Why are you bonded to dhclient? How about dhcpd? Why are you bonded to
>> ifupdown? How about a reduced helper than only sets a static IP address
>> and speaks basic DHCP?
>
> Essentially because we want
hero...@gentoo.org, le Sat 24 Aug 2013 18:31:15 +0900, a écrit :
> Why are you bonded to dhclient? How about dhcpd? Why are you bonded to
> ifupdown? How about a reduced helper than only sets a static IP address
> and speaks basic DHCP?
Essentially because we want to follow the standard Debian way
Hey 4winter,
4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de writes:
> With some tiny patches for `ifupdown` I've been able to resolve
> `network related issues `_. All of them?
> Of course not, funny thing about developing for the Hurd is that once
> you fix one thing, then some other thing or code path is ex
4 matches
Mail list logo
