Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Helmut Grohne, le dim. 20 févr. 2022 07:50:59 +0100, a ecrit: > Once doing that, we effectively get the very same packages just > without -linux or -kfreebsd. Yep, that's what I understood > I'm wondering whether that should be expanded to just cover the full > matrix withing x86 architectures

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-19 Thread Helmut Grohne
Hi Samuel, On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 12:01:36AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Mmm, it still targets hurd- explicitly, so I'd say it should still > be called mig-x86-64-gnu. I can relate to that, yes. > What I'm wondering is why we added -linux/-kfreebsd since here they are > host, not target.

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Helmut Grohne, le ven. 18 févr. 2022 14:13:09 +0100, a ecrit: > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 12:45:57PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Just to spell out, what might perhaps be obvious here, but I think > > they key is that MIG is "kernel independent", so it provides an > > interface which is

Processed: Re: Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + moreinfo Bug #1005959 [mig-for-host] mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 1005959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005959 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-18 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Guillem, On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 12:45:57PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Just to spell out, what might perhaps be obvious here, but I think > they key is that MIG is "kernel independent", so it provides an > interface which is none- which means it can be used on

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-18 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2022-02-18 at 09:42:12 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Helmut Grohne, le ven. 18 févr. 2022 06:20:45 +0100, a ecrit: > > I'm quite surprised about the existence of mig-for-host:amd64 and > > mig-x86-64-linux-gnu. I'm also a little little surprised about > > mig:amd64. Are you sure

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Helmut Grohne, le ven. 18 févr. 2022 06:20:45 +0100, a ecrit: > I'm quite surprised about the existence of mig-for-host:amd64 and > mig-x86-64-linux-gnu. I'm also a little little surprised about > mig:amd64. Are you sure that these are correct? Well, they have the same role as their i386

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-17 Thread William ML Leslie
On Fri, 18 Feb 2022, 5:21 pm Helmut Grohne, wrote: > Package: mig-for-host > Version: 1.8+git20200618-9 > User: helm...@debian.org > Usertags: rebootstrap > > Hi Samuel, > > I'm quite surprised about the existence of mig-for-host:amd64 and > mig-x86-64-linux-gnu. I'm also a little little

Bug#1005959: mig-for-host:amd64 should not exist

2022-02-17 Thread Helmut Grohne
Package: mig-for-host Version: 1.8+git20200618-9 User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Hi Samuel, I'm quite surprised about the existence of mig-for-host:amd64 and mig-x86-64-linux-gnu. I'm also a little little surprised about mig:amd64. Are you sure that these are correct? I think none