On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:01:32 +0200, Johan Walles wrote:
> This bug is the only reason gnumach-dev isn't in testing:
>
> http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnumach-dev
>
> Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
> explain why it should still be open.
T
Guillem Jover, le Wed 30 May 2007 18:28:33 +0300, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:13:32 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
> > > Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
> > > explain why it should still be
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 15:13:32 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
> > Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
> > explain why it should still be open.
>
> Mmm, I'd say the explanation given by Michael still hold
On Wed, May 30, 2007 14:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
>> Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
>> explain why it should still be open.
>
> Mmm, I'd say the explanation given by Michael still holds?
And I'd p
Johan Walles, le Wed 30 May 2007 15:01:32 +0200, a écrit :
> Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
> explain why it should still be open.
Mmm, I'd say the explanation given by Michael still holds?
Samuel
This bug is the only reason gnumach-dev isn't in testing:
http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=gnumach-dev
Somebody who understands this better than me, please close this bug or
explain why it should still be open.
Regards //Johan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
6 matches
Mail list logo
