Jelmer Vernooij, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 13:03:39 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Andrew Bartlett, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 21:46:32 +1300, a écrit :
> > > This is also the wrong place to propose such patches. Please get them
> > > accepted (or more lik
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 21:46:32 +1300, a écrit :
> > This is also the wrong place to propose such patches. Please get them
> > accepted (or more likely, clearly rejected) upstream on
> > samba-techni...@lists.samba.org
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 09:56 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 21:46:32 +1300, a écrit :
> > This is also the wrong place to propose such patches. Please get them
> > accepted (or more likely, clearly rejected) upstream on
> > samba-techni...@lists.samba.org as thi
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 09:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Andrew Bartlett, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 21:46:32 +1300, a écrit :
> > I don't see how you can declare this safe when the patch edits out whole
> > chunks of the testsuite?
>
> It only edits out the chunks which really require actual record lo
On Sun, 2015-03-01 at 22:37 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With the current hurd libc and tdb built with the attached patches,
> making it use whole-file locking on platforms which don't support record
> locking, tdb works fine, ./bin/tdbtorture -n 10 says "OK", it takes
> 3m to comple
Andrew Bartlett, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 21:46:32 +1300, a écrit :
> This is also the wrong place to propose such patches. Please get them
> accepted (or more likely, clearly rejected) upstream on
> samba-techni...@lists.samba.org as this is clearly not a simple
> packaging matter.
Well, it isn't a pa
Andrew Bartlett, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 21:46:32 +1300, a écrit :
> I don't see how you can declare this safe when the patch edits out whole
> chunks of the testsuite?
It only edits out the chunks which really require actual record locking
support.
> Or, fix your target OS to have fcntl() locks, like
On Sun, 2015-03-01 at 22:37 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> With the current hurd libc and tdb built with the attached patches,
> making it use whole-file locking on platforms which don't support record
> locking, tdb works fine, ./bin/tdbtorture -n 10 says "OK", it takes
> 3m to comple
Hello,
With the current hurd libc and tdb built with the attached patches,
making it use whole-file locking on platforms which don't support record
locking, tdb works fine, ./bin/tdbtorture -n 10 says "OK", it takes
3m to complete, which is not so bad compared to the 30s it takes with
proper recor
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 06:46:43PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Manuel Menal, le Sat 23 Aug 2014 22:56:11 +0200, a écrit :
> > I do hope too that partial file locking gets implemented on GNU/Hurd ASAP.
> > But in the meantime, it would be a shame not to have a working samba, when
> > it *does* w
Manuel Menal, le Sat 23 Aug 2014 22:56:11 +0200, a écrit :
> I do hope too that partial file locking gets implemented on GNU/Hurd ASAP.
> But in the meantime, it would be a shame not to have a working samba, when
> it *does* work fine with this patch.
Well, it's not only about samba, it's also blo
Jelmer Vernooij, le Sun 24 Aug 2014 00:02:05 +0200, a écrit :
> > I do hope too that partial file locking gets implemented on GNU/Hurd ASAP.
> > But in the meantime, it would be a shame not to have a working samba, when
> > it *does* work fine with this patch.
> I'm not convinced this will actually
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 10:56:11PM +0200, Manuel Menal wrote:
> On 23/08/2014 22:27, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> >On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 02:30:33PM -0400, Manuel Menal wrote:
> >>tdb fails to build on hurd-i386 (blocking ldb and thus samba) because
> >>it uses two features that are not yet implemente
On Sat, 2014-08-23 at 22:56 +0200, Manuel Menal wrote:
> On 23/08/2014 22:27, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> > block 759008 by 748943
> > tags 759008 -patch
> > Please fix byte range locking in the Hurd (see the blocking bug I've
> > added), or propose a patch that uses an alternative *and* passes the
>
On 23/08/2014 22:27, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
block 759008 by 748943
tags 759008 -patch
thanks
Hi Manuel,
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 02:30:33PM -0400, Manuel Menal wrote:
tdb fails to build on hurd-i386 (blocking ldb and thus samba) because
it uses two features that are not yet implemented
Package: libtdb1
Version: 1.3.0-1.1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hello,
tdb fails to build on hurd-i386 (blocking ldb and thus samba) because
it uses two features that are not yet implemented on GNU/Hurd: msync(1)
and partial file locking.
You'll find attached two small patches that make it b
16 matches
Mail list logo
