[ with my m68k buildd maintainer and (ex-?) porter hat ]
Aurelien Jarno dixit:
- debian-ports uses mini-dak instead of dak. It uses less resources and
brings some features that are useful for new architectures like
accepting binary uploads when it improves the version even if it is
not the
On 2015-05-06 10:44, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
[ with my m68k buildd maintainer and (ex-?) porter hat ]
Aurelien Jarno dixit:
- debian-ports uses mini-dak instead of dak. It uses less resources and
brings some features that are useful for new architectures like
accepting binary uploads
Richard Braun, le Tue 05 May 2015 12:27:10 +, a écrit :
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:36:57PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Given that the package coverage of the Hurd continuously increased and
that it just released 0.6 of its core components[1] along with releasing
Debian
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 02:21:00PM +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
Really?! So Hurd actually has a sufficient number of developers
worldiwde?! And if Devuan is so welcome and Debian so hostile, more
power to them, I just don;t know what are you waiting here and
polluting our ML with toxic tone!
Am Montag, 20. April 2015, 00:22:08 schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
hurd-i386
=
Well before wheezy was released, we talked with the HURD porters, and
they agreed to re-check their archive status just after the wheezy
release[1]. The plan was to move the HURD port off ftp-master if it
wasn't
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:36:57PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Given that the package coverage of the Hurd continuously increased and
that it just released 0.6 of its core components[1] along with releasing
Debian GNU/Hurd[2], this strikes me as an odd time to throw the Hurd off
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
[Speaking for the debian-hurd team]
Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 04 May 2015 08:28:22 +0200, a écrit :
Maybe it's just about supporting and advertising debian-ports as
Debian's official way to host second-class architectures. Maybe
+++ Samuel Thibault [2015-05-05 09:17 +0200]:
* Getting binNMUs from d-release transitions
This saves porters a lot of tedious work that would otherwise be just
duplicated. We are not talking about fine-grain binNMUs here, but
coarse-grain well-known planned binNMUs. Wanna-build supports
[Speaking for the debian-hurd team]
Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 04 May 2015 08:28:22 +0200, a écrit :
Maybe it's just about supporting and advertising debian-ports as
Debian's official way to host second-class architectures. Maybe
there's more to it. What are the current downsides of moving
On 05/05/15 at 09:17 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
* Appearing on packages' and maintainers' PTS
pages like http://buildd.debian.org/bash and
https://buildd.debian.org/sthiba...@debian.org
* Being considered as second-class citizen
Note that our developer dashboards (DDPO, Tracker, DMD) are
[ With my debian-ports admin hat ]
On 2015-05-04 11:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org (2015-05-04):
I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
other teams. I'm not
On 20/04/15 at 00:22 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
Hi,
As the jessie release approaches, the ftp-team have been reviewing the
status of the architectures in unstable.
Neither sparc nor hurd-i386 are going to release with jessie and we are
therefore looking at their future in unstable.
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org (2015-05-04):
I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of debian-ports.org,
and of what the current downsides of
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org (2015-05-04):
I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
other teams. I'm not entirely clear on the status of
On 04/05/15 at 18:04 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum lu...@debian.org (2015-05-04):
I'm wondering if we could find a way to accomodate those architectures
in an official way, while still limiting the impact on ftpmasters and
On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
That pad says: As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
ports. If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
hurd and sparc until this is fixed...
Hurd is already on d-p, so hurd actually has double infrastructure
Joerg Jaspert, le Mon 04 May 2015 18:11:29 +0200, a écrit :
On 13931 March 1977, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
That pad says: As a result of current state, d-ports cannot accept more
ports. If that's still true, it would make sense to postpone dropping
hurd and sparc until this is fixed...
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 12:50 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
I for one am tired of this discussion popping up each Debian release,
and I only had to endure it twice now. Let's ditch Debian in favor of
a less hostile downstream distribution. I guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/20/2015 01:49 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 12:50 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
I for one am tired of this discussion popping up each Debian
release, and I only had to endure
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200, a écrit :
Well, Hurd is welcome to Devuan if sufficiently many developers commit
their time to it.
Which is the recurring issue. Be it Debian or Devuan doesn't change
that.
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 12:50 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
I for one am tired of this discussion popping up each Debian release,
and I only had to endure it twice now. Let's ditch Debian
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 14:21 +0200, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
On 04/20/2015 01:49 PM, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 12:50 +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
...
I for one am very
grateful of all work Samuel and Justus put on Hurd and although I am a
Linux user I have big sentimental
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 14:38:17 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 14:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 14:24:34 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200,
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 14:24:34 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200, a écrit :
Well, Hurd is welcome to Devuan if sufficiently many developers commit
their time to it.
Which is the
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 14:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 14:24:34 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:55 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 13:49:37 +0200, a écrit :
Well, Hurd is welcome to Devuan if sufficiently
Justus Winter, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 12:50:44 +0200, a écrit :
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
We'll be removing HURD, as discussed, from the ftp-master archive after
the Jessie release.
I never quite understood the benefit of removing the Hurd port from
ftp-master. Anyone?
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (2015-04-20 00:22:08)
We'll be removing HURD, as discussed, from the ftp-master archive after
the Jessie release.
I never quite understood the benefit of removing the Hurd port from
ftp-master. Anyone?
I for one am tired of this discussion popping up each Debian release,
Hello,
Joerg Jaspert, le Mon 20 Apr 2015 00:22:08 +0200, a écrit :
hurd-i386
=
Well before wheezy was released, we talked with the HURD porters, and
they agreed to re-check their archive status just after the wheezy
release[1]. The plan was to move the HURD port off ftp-master if it
Hi,
As the jessie release approaches, the ftp-team have been reviewing the
status of the architectures in unstable.
Neither sparc nor hurd-i386 are going to release with jessie and we are
therefore looking at their future in unstable.
SPARC
=
29 matches
Mail list logo
