On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 09:26, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > glibc-2.3.1 seems to cut our uptime in half. With glibc-2.2.x I could
> > build all of glibc natively, and with glibc-2.3 I can't.
>
> As we found out before, I can build in glibc-2.3. I am not sure why you
> can't.
Interesting. I thoug
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:55:17PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> glibc-2.3.1 seems to cut our uptime in half. With glibc-2.2.x I could
> build all of glibc natively, and with glibc-2.3 I can't.
As we found out before, I can build in glibc-2.3. I am not sure why you
can't.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`R
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> libdb4.0 still doesn't appear to be fixed by the Debian maintainer,
> despite the cross-arch FTBFS bugs on it. I'll compile it and post on
> alpha. Perhaps then we can actually get perl-5.8. *sigh*
Boo! No mc! No manpages!
> It appears that the gcc-
Here's a quick update for where we seem to be at for hurd-i386.
I now have a machine at home with the Hurd running on it again, so I can
do some work when my brain is too tired for the RC bugs in glibc. ;)
The buildd should start spewing out packages this week. Ryan and Nick
have agreed to keep
4 matches
Mail list logo
