James Clarke, on mar. 20 juin 2017 06:18:18 +0100, wrote:
> In all seriousness though, is there anywhere explaining what the issue with
> GDB
> is?
Searching a bit ("gdb pie hurd"...) the mailing lists archive,
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2016-11/msg00043.html
> I see [1] but
On 19 Jun 2017, at 22:13, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Pino Toscano, on dim. 18 juin 2017 21:33:53 +0200, wrote:
>> as $subj asks, should we ask for GCC with PIE enabled by default, like
>> is done in the majority of the other archs (i.e. [1])?
>
> Ideally, yes. In practice, it
Hello,
Pino Toscano, on dim. 18 juin 2017 21:33:53 +0200, wrote:
> as $subj asks, should we ask for GCC with PIE enabled by default, like
> is done in the majority of the other archs (i.e. [1])?
Ideally, yes. In practice, it works but gdb is lost with PIE
executables, so that has to be fixed
Hi,
as $subj asks, should we ask for GCC with PIE enabled by default, like
is done in the majority of the other archs (i.e. [1])?
Is it supposed to work on Hurd as well, or does it require any kind of
work for it? (Yes, I could dive in GCC sources, but since it is not an
easy task, I figured
4 matches
Mail list logo