Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It doesn't understand wildcards or regexps, either. Sigh.
>
> ulysses:~# dpkg --search '*/lib/libX11.so'
> xlibs-dev: /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so
I swear I tried that before replying to you. I blame sleep
deprivation. Here's an updated patch:
--- /b
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 02:13:21PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > [1] When searching for libfoo.so.4's package, it will not only find
> > > the package containing /lib/libfoo.so.4, but also the package
> > > containing /bar/bazlib/libfoo.so.4.
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [1] When searching for libfoo.so.4's package, it will not only find
> > the package containing /lib/libfoo.so.4, but also the package
> > containing /bar/bazlib/libfoo.so.4. From a quick skim of the archive
> > only acroread, gnat, and petsc2.1.0-de
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:11:05PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Since this also bit me today, I've hacked dpkg-shlibdeps 1.9.12 here
> (Marcus's patch does no longer apply). My version does not spew
> warnings, but may generate a spurious dependency in obscure cases[1]
This piece of code dpkg-
Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So there are a couple of missing dependencies. Jeff, is the
> dpkg-shlibdeps problem rearing its head again on your end?
Since this also bit me today, I've hacked dpkg-shlibdeps 1.9.12 here
(Marcus's patch does no longer apply). My version does not s
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Apt likes it, but users will not get all required library packages when
> installing it.
> A simple recompile will fix this. I count on Jeff.
>
**Jeff**
Would you let me know when the job is done where I can get it.
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 3
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:40:14PM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> What do you want me to do? Exclude it again? If so, is their any chance
> of a quick fix?
Apt likes it, but users will not get all required library packages when
installing it.
A simple recompile will fix this. I count on Jeff.
On 22 Jun 2001, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> This exim package has:
>
*
Apt liked this exim.
What do you want me to do? Exclude it again? If so, is their any chance
of a quick fix?
> This package should not go onto the CD.
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Dun
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 02:53:36PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > So there are a couple of missing dependencies. Jeff, is the
> > dpkg-shlibdeps problem rearing its head again on your end?
>
> That more looks like out of date libtool.
Uh, ignore me. I am really slow today.
Marcus
--
`Rhub
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 02:47:14PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> This exim package has:
>
> Depends: libc0.2 (>= 2.2.1-2), libdb2 (>= 2:2.7.7-4), libpam0g (>= 0.72-1),
> cron (>=3.0pl1-42), netbase
>
> $ ldd /sbin/sendmail
> libident.so.0 =&
This exim package has:
Depends: libc0.2 (>= 2.2.1-2), libdb2 (>= 2:2.7.7-4), libpam0g (>= 0.72-1),
cron (>=3.0pl1-42), netbase
$ ldd /sbin/sendmail
libident.so.0 => not found
libpcre.so.3 => not found
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/li
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I want us in testing for two reasons:
>
> 1) Visibility
> 2) So we have a noose around various maintainers necks if they break
> their packages.
>
> But we need to be compiling 90%+ of the packages succesfully to do
> this. Without pthreads, and withou
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 03:14:08AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:03:32PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:31:51PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:21:10AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> > >
> > > > Waiting on the new
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:03:32PM -0400, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:31:51PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:21:10AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> >
> > > Waiting on the new gcc-3.0. The one in the archive is 2.95
> >
> > My screen this morning sh
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 12:31:51PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:21:10AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
>
> > Waiting on the new gcc-3.0. The one in the archive is 2.95
>
> My screen this morning showed that GCC has compiled, but the packaging
> wanted a boehm collector fo
OK, I will wait.
Phil.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:21:10AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
>
> > Waiting on the new gcc-3.0. The one in the archive is 2.95
>
> My screen this morning showed that GCC has compiled, but the packaging
> wanted a boehm collect
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:43:43PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
>
> > FWIW, if hurd-i386 were included in the "testing" mechanism, could you
> > easily produce CDs from testing? This would prevent problems like
> > e2fsprog's.
>
> I want us in testing
On 19 Jun 2001, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > exim, ae are OK then. I will wait for gcc-3.0
>
> It would be good to avoid e2fsprogs 1.20-2 which is currently in the
> archive. With it you have to answer yes for every di
> wanted a boehm collector for something.
A Java garbage collector.
pgpoHg31tVFIu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 03:43:43PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> FWIW, if hurd-i386 were included in the "testing" mechanism, could you
> easily produce CDs from testing? This would prevent problems like
> e2fsprog's.
I want us in testing for two reasons:
1) Visibility
2) So we have a noose
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 10:21:10AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> Waiting on the new gcc-3.0. The one in the archive is 2.95
My screen this morning showed that GCC has compiled, but the packaging
wanted a boehm collector for something. I will fix the packaging and
upload this evening.
At least
Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> exim, ae are OK then. I will wait for gcc-3.0
It would be good to avoid e2fsprogs 1.20-2 which is currently in the
archive. With it you have to answer yes for every disk when booting.
We're still waiting on the resolve of a small c
On 19 Jun 2001, Oystein Viggen wrote:
> Quoth Philip Charles:
>
> > So I can use the new exim when it gets into the main archive?
>
> If you're impatient like me, you can even grab it from incoming ;)
>
> The dependencies are there, and it works for me when se
Quoth Philip Charles:
> So I can use the new exim when it gets into the main archive?
If you're impatient like me, you can even grab it from incoming ;)
The dependencies are there, and it works for me when sending mail both
locally and over the network. I was not able to send mail to
On 19 Jun 2001, Oystein Viggen wrote:
> Quoth Oystein Viggen:
>
> > Quoth Jeff Bailey:
> >
> > > I have uploaded exim.
> >
> > It does not seem to me that it is proper for the hurd package of exim to
> > depend on netbase? The hurd d
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> ae's now done and uploaded. It should appear in the next processing
> run. If it doesn't, please let me know, since I've never done an
> upload like this before.
Jeff,
Success.
ae 962-30.01 is now in the main debian archive.
Phil.
-
Philip
Quoth Oystein Viggen:
> Quoth Jeff Bailey:
>
> > I have uploaded exim.
>
> It does not seem to me that it is proper for the hurd package of exim to
> depend on netbase? The hurd deb package in incoming does.
Ah. My bad.
Inetutils provides netbase, so there is no p
Quoth Jeff Bailey:
> I have uploaded exim.
It does not seem to me that it is proper for the hurd package of exim to
depend on netbase? The hurd deb package in incoming does.
Oystein
--
When in doubt: Recompile.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > Phillip,
>
> Erp, sorry about the typo. =)
>
Thanks for the apology. I am used to it. I get called Charles half the
time.
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Dunedin, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell GNU/Linux CDs.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I have uploaded exim. Bug #101409 contains the patch for those
> wanting to do it themselves. Credits: Thanks, Marcus, for pointing me
> in the right direction (And implementing the network ioctls!)
>
> Phillip, was there anything else
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:51:10PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Phillip,
Erp, sorry about the typo. =)
I have uploaded exim. Bug #101409 contains the patch for those
wanting to do it themselves. Credits: Thanks, Marcus, for pointing me
in the right direction (And implementing the network ioctls!)
Phillip, was there anything else that you had as release critical? ae
& exim were the only 2 I
On Sun, 17 Jun 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:53:40AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> > exim 2.11-3 and ae 962-30 have not changed in the main archive since the
> > F2 discs. I realise that they can be tweeked so they work, but anything
> > on the CDs
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:53:40AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> exim 2.11-3 and ae 962-30 have not changed in the main archive since the
> F2 discs. I realise that they can be tweeked so they work, but anything
> on the CDs should work straight out of the box.
ae's now done and
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:53:40AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> exim 2.11-3 and ae 962-30 have not changed in the main archive since the
> F2 discs. I realise that they can be tweeked so they work, but anything
> on the CDs should work straight out of the box.
I'll recompile
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:53:40AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> exim 2.11-3 and ae 962-30 have not changed in the main archive since the
> F2 discs. I realise that they can be tweeked so they work, but anything
> on the CDs should work straight out of the box.
>
> Any chance o
exim 2.11-3 and ae 962-30 have not changed in the main archive since the
F2 discs. I realise that they can be tweeked so they work, but anything
on the CDs should work straight out of the box.
Any chance of finding fully functional versions anywhere?
I am hoping to produce the F3 series in the
Hi ,
Today I compiled exim of version 3-13 succesfully on my hurd box. I need to
create some temp links on /usr/lib for achieving this. Below is the list of
things i did
Compile db2. Interesting there is no make install.
remove exim_monitor from builddirctory/Makefile make if ( make if
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 01:02:01AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I've got the cyrus-sasl package built, with the patch no prob.
>
> openldap2 appears to have a series of problems:
>
> 1) it doesn't run autoconf after it patches configure.in
> 2) when I run autoconf by hand it triggers the empty-./c
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> It isn't for lack of trying. =(
This is appreciated. We survived F1 without it and we can survive F2 just
as well.
> good night!
Sleep well.
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Dunedin, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 05:19:08AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> Need I say more?
>
> I should be ready to freeze the Hurd sub-archive within the next 24 hours
> and I would like to include a working exim. Is there a working package
> somewhere that I could download?
It is
Need I say more?
I should be ready to freeze the Hurd sub-archive within the next 24 hours
and I would like to include a working exim. Is there a working package
somewhere that I could download?
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Dunedin, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267
quoth jbailey:
> Got it! Here's the slang problem:
>
> # Correct the .so link
> cd debian/tmp/usr/lib ; ln -sf /lib/libslang.so.$(SONUMBER)
> libslang.so
>
> Basically, on G/Linux ports slang lives in /lib, and this creates a
> symlink in /usr/lib for some reason.
>
> I don't kn
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 08:06:15AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> > I don't know if Turtle has a provision for re-building the package,
> > and possibly adding .0 to the end (Marcus?), but after I get this
> > sorted out, I'll rebuilt ae so you can get the CD out.
> Thanks. It will be great if yo
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:00:20PM +0200, Fabian Sturm wrote:
> It was what the difference is between woody and sid.
> I could figure this out with the FAQ but what i couldn't find out
> is where the src packeges are which build the binary .deb
> archives in the sid directorys?
Woody is the next
Hello!
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:54:12PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> I think I just figured out what the 'ae' problem is (I've been working
> on this more than I've been working on the exim problem. I suspect
[...]
>
> The package slang1-dev contains /
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 10:54:12PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I think I just figured out what the 'ae' problem is (I've been working
> on this more than I've been working on the exim problem. I suspect
> the exim problem will require me to do a source NMU, since the
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> I don't know if Turtle has a provision for re-building the package,
> and possibly adding .0 to the end (Marcus?), but after I get this
> sorted out, I'll rebuilt ae so you can get the CD out.
>
Thanks. It will be great if you can do it.
Phil.
-
Philip
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:22:17AM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> Are these packages fixed yet. If not is there any chance that they will
> be fixed by the end of the month?
I think I just figured out what the 'ae' problem is (I've been working
on this more than I'v
Are these packages fixed yet. If not is there any chance that they will
be fixed by the end of the month?
Phil.
-
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson St., Dunedin, New Zealand; +64 3 4882818
Mobile 025 267 9420. I sell GNU/Linux CDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred
On Mon, May 31, 1999 at 02:29:30AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> cf15ae02291e9d48a618b09abff68f03 575804 mail optional
> exim_2.11-3_hurd-i386.deb
If you want to test this, set your permissions on /var/spool/mail and /tmp
correctly!
chmod go+w /tmp
chmod g+w /var/spool/mail
Thanks,
Marcus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Format: 1.5
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 23:50:16 +
Source: exim
Binary: eximon exim
Architecture: hurd-i386
Version: 2.11-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
exim - Exim Mailer
52 matches
Mail list logo
