Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-08 Thread Nathan Owen
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:00:17AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote: > * James Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020507 10:56]: > > > > > > hurd:~# settrans -ap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/pfinet -i eth0 -a > > > > 192.168.0.2 > > > -g 192.168.0.1 -m 255.255.255.0 > > > > hurd:~# ping 192.168.0.1 > > > > PING 1

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-07 Thread Grant Bowman
* James Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020507 10:56]: > > > > hurd:~# settrans -ap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/pfinet -i eth0 -a 192.168.0.2 > > -g 192.168.0.1 -m 255.255.255.0 > > > hurd:~# ping 192.168.0.1 > > > PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1): 56 data bytes > > > 64 bytes from hurd.grantbow.com (192.

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-07 Thread James Morrison
> > hurd:~# settrans -ap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/pfinet -i eth0 -a 192.168.0.2 > -g 192.168.0.1 -m 255.255.255.0 > > hurd:~# ping 192.168.0.1 > > PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1): 56 data bytes > > 64 bytes from hurd.grantbow.com (192.168.0.2): Destination Host Unreachable > > Vr HL TOS Len ID Fl

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-07 Thread Grant Bowman
Hi again all. Still no go. The comments from Alfred and James are appreciated but looking overy my config I still see nothing wrong. It works fine under Linux and Windows. What tools do I need to debug a Mach kernel driver? I'm over my head in dealing with debugging this. So what, get a ne

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-02 Thread James Morrison
> I've attached the /dev/klog & "ifconfig --verbose" output in case > there's any clue there. This is a DE-220 NIC that I started to discuss > on hurd-help. Here's the actual change I made to > gnumach-20020421/linux/dev/drivers/net/Space.c > >static struct device eth0_dev = { >"eth0

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-02 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
* Grant Bowman writes: * Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020501 11:22]: > I am confused at these results, but the packets just don't want to > get off the NIC. Pinging from another host does not give any reply. > I did the -fg then -ap (see below) but still the same. showtrans > gives me ba

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-01 Thread Grant Bowman
* Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020501 11:22]: > * Richard Kreuter writes: > > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:30:41AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote: > >> Now comes another "hurd"le - directing IP packets in the kernel. > >> I'm so close and yet so far away from getting it working. I > >> followed

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-01 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:21:24PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > * Richard Kreuter writes something false > > This is removes the translator on that node, and sets it to "", which > means that it sets it to nothing. > > So supplying "/hurd/pfinet ..." after it sets it to whatever was supplied.

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-01 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
* Richard Kreuter writes: > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:30:41AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote: >> Now comes another "hurd"le - directing IP packets in the kernel. >> I'm so close and yet so far away from getting it working. I >> followed the directions for '/hurd/pfinet --help' but when I try to >> pi

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-01 Thread Richard Kreuter
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:30:41AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote: > > Now comes another "hurd"le - directing IP packets in the kernel. > I'm so close and yet so far away from getting it working. I > followed the directions for '/hurd/pfinet --help' but when I try to > ping I see: > > hurd:~# settrans

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-01 Thread James Morrison
> After some poking around I understand that netbase is NOT used for the > Hurd. Instead there's inetutils. It doesn't feel like Debian without > netbase and it's trappings. Seems like some good wrapper scripts are > appropriate. OK, fine, I'm getting over it. However there's no route > comma

Re: IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-01 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 07:30:41AM -0700, Grant Bowman wrote: > After some poking around I understand that netbase is NOT used for > the Hurd. Instead there's inetutils. It doesn't feel like Debian > without netbase and it's trappings. Seems like some good wrapper > scripts are appropriate. OK

IP handling in Mach/Hurd - route & ifconfig functionality

2002-05-01 Thread Grant Bowman
OK, after much effort I finally got my network card working under the GnuMach! Yeah!!! The email I found via googling "hurd ne2000" was: http://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2000/debian-hurd-200010/msg00025.html I got it running by hard coding eth0 to IRQ 10 and address 0x240 into the file "gnum