After researching this, and from some responses that I have recieved
on this, I agree that it would be a rather pointless and also monumental
task to accomplish this. My time would be much better spent adding
more comments to the Mach sources and just working with them.
And so that's what I'm d
"B. Douglas Hilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am thinking that the Mach uKernel is severely hampering
> the Hurd project. As lond as Hurd only relies on mach.h it
> would be very effective to rewrite oskit-mach in Ada.
I don't think rewriting any or all pieces in a different language
would
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 11:45:51PM -0400, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
> If I could provide a mach.h and a MIG for a kernel written
> in Ada, would it be possible to rebuild Hurd for it?
If you have come so far, it will be a piece of cake for you to find out if
that works, and we will be interested to
I am thinking that the Mach uKernel is severely hampering
the Hurd project. As lond as Hurd only relies on mach.h it
would be very effective to rewrite oskit-mach in Ada.
Why do I suggest this? Because I am an experienced C
programmer and I really am lost with the Mach sources.
I'm sorry bu
4 matches
Mail list logo
