On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:35:32PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Are you willing to accept help on this? I can hack together something
> > on Sunday. Basically, it will be a completely seperate package
> > that calls turtle to manipulate the database. It should eventually be
> > integrated
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:23:11PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The problem is that there are now two source packages which produce the same
> > binaries. How can an autobuilder know which of the two should be build?
>
> Well, to Ben's credit
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:59:13PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Ben, was there a hard requirement to rename the source? It is okay to rename
> db to db2 if you intend to continue with db to build libdb3 packages. But
> they got into their own source, so that's probably not the case.
>
Ther
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that there are now two source packages which produce the same
> binaries. How can an autobuilder know which of the two should be build?
Well, to Ben's credit it should be said that this problem is somewhat
peculiar to turtle. AFAIK the
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:32:50PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The problem is that db hasn't been obsoleted by another package, so it
> > should probably still be built.
>
> The source package "db" IS obsolete. All the packages previously
> buil
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:04:34AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:53:06PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > > This'll be a bit of a pain to find your package, since it will mean
> > > you have to look in 2 places for build information. My understanding
> > > from Marcus is
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem is that db hasn't been obsoleted by another package, so it
> should probably still be built.
The source package "db" IS obsolete. All the packages previously
built from it (basically, libdb2*) now build from the source package
"db2". All exce
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:53:06PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > This'll be a bit of a pain to find your package, since it will mean
> > you have to look in 2 places for build information. My understanding
> > from Marcus is that he's cleaning up some of the error handling in
> > turtle befor
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 03:33:49PM +0200, Erik Verbruggen wrote:
> > > db - This broke in the last version - I think their looking for
> > > profiles C libraries. Check the build log.
> >
> > db is obsolete, the source package is called db2 now. The changelog
> > includes:
> >
> >* Get rid
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 08:51:51PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> This'll be a bit of a pain to find your package, since it will mean
> you have to look in 2 places for build information. My understanding
> from Marcus is that he's cleaning up some of the error handling in
> turtle before resolving t
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 12:56:26PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > db - This broke in the last version - I think their looking for
> > profiles C libraries. Check the build log.
>
> db is obsolete, the source package is called db2 now. The changelog
>
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FYI, the second build machine (the actual full time one) has begun to
> do it's task today. For now, it's reports are at
> http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/turtle1, and my home machine will
> continue to fill the main turtle directory.
Cool!
> db - Thi
FYI, the second build machine (the actual full time one) has begun to
do it's task today. For now, it's reports are at
http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/turtle1, and my home machine will
continue to fill the main turtle directory.
This'll be a bit of a pain to find your package, since it will mea
13 matches
Mail list logo
