On Sun, 3 Apr 2005, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:26:04PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> > > [K8 CDs]
>
> > H. Time for a new CD set?
>
> There are differences between K8's and crosshurd's native-install that
> could (and should) be fixed, then.
> The former one e.g. doe
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:26:04PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> > [K8 CDs]
> H. Time for a new CD set?
There are differences between K8's and crosshurd's native-install that
could (and should) be fixed, then.
The former one e.g. does not set up /servers/default-pager.
Regards,
Thomas
>It appears emacs21 might be broken. Somebody knowing emacs should
>probably look at this. Maybe it was just my local system, but it
>already segfaulted in postinst and then when I tried to open a file.
When I tried to install emacs21 last week, I run into simular problems too.
Cheers
An
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:26:26PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote:
> H. Time for a new CD set?
It appears emacs21 might be broken. Somebody knowing emacs should
probably look at this. Maybe it was just my local system, but it
already segfaulted in postinst and then when I tried to open a file.
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Andre Caldas wrote:
> Hello, list!
>
> I just installed the hurd using crosshurd from a Debian GNU/Linux
> system. Now I am wondering: would it be better to install from the K8 CDs?
>
> What are the advantages of one method over the other? For example: are
> there work-arrounds
5 matches
Mail list logo