what up dude
There's a Hurd story on the front page of Slashdot. Just
wanted to let everyone know.
-- Tom Hart
ave
on Debian that would be much appreciated. I'm not inclined to post
Slashdot trash =)
And general Debian GNU/Hurd articles are always appreciated.
Regards,
Rob
--
Rob 'robster' Bradford
Founder: http://www.debianplanet.org/
Developer: http://www.debian.org/
Monke
On 30-Sep-02 10:43:28 Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JB> Neal's pthreads for Hurd package just made the slashdot front
JB> page.
JB> If any of you have time over the day, can you please check in
JB> there and help dispell some of the usual FUD and misinformation
--- Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:19:53PM +0200, PUYDT Julien wrote:
> > Le lun 30/09/2002 à 17:43, Jeff Bailey a écrit :
> > > Neal's pthreads for Hurd package just made the slashdot front page.
> >
> > By the way, I r
e trolling, a few people will
look at the slashdot article and decide that the Hurd is worth a try
one more time.
If we're *really* lucky, they'll be ex-Kernel hackers from somewhere
else who decide that they need a challenge. Pretty much all of the
folks we have hacking away right now se
Le lun 30/09/2002 à 18:32, Jeff Bailey a écrit :
> "And the poor sysadmin is probably sitting there wondering why his
> connection is slow, pulls up slashdot for some light reading and
> screams in anguish as he realises he has about 10 seconds left of
> usable net connection.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:19:53PM +0200, PUYDT Julien wrote:
> > Neal's pthreads for Hurd package just made the slashdot front page.
> By the way, I remember some years ago on that same front page the
> news about somebody running a www server (apache?) under the
> Hurd. His
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:19:53PM +0200, PUYDT Julien wrote:
> Le lun 30/09/2002 à 17:43, Jeff Bailey a écrit :
> > Neal's pthreads for Hurd package just made the slashdot front page.
>
> By the way, I remember some years ago on that same front page the news
> about somebo
Le lun 30/09/2002 à 17:43, Jeff Bailey a écrit :
> Neal's pthreads for Hurd package just made the slashdot front page.
By the way, I remember some years ago on that same front page the news
about somebody running a www server (apache?) under the Hurd. His
connection was dead in minutes...
Neal's pthreads for Hurd package just made the slashdot front page.
If any of you have time over the day, can you please check in there
and help dispell some of the usual FUD and misinformation that is
usual for slashdot? (Especially around the Hurd!)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
learning
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:45:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jeff and others have been defending the flag...
Hurd articles are the only time I get moderated up. ;) I have to get
my karma points *sometime*...
--
Abandon the search for truth; settle for a good fantasy.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 03:33:43PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Of course, 99% of the discussion is about what the name should be.
> Unfortunately, nobody pointed them to the FAQ entry about the naming
> yet.
I'm generally willing to beleive that anyone who's going to waste
their time by rant
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 01:45:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>As you may already know, or not care, Debian GNU/Hurd gets a
> mention on slashdot:
>
> http://slashdot.org/articles/01/10/15/2357255.shtml
>
> Jeff and others have been defe
As you may already know, or not care, Debian GNU/Hurd gets a
mention on slashdot:
http://slashdot.org/articles/01/10/15/2357255.shtml
Jeff and others have been defending the flag...
Login/Create an Account | 278
comments | Search Discussion
Threshold: [4: 6 comments...]
[Threaded...][Oldest First.] __ _
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted
them. Slashdot is not responsible for what they say.
Avoid
Marcus Brinkmann writes:
> Cliff-whoever-he-is should never have posted this question, as it is
> downright silly and the quick answer is more than obvious, and the long
> answer is not to be found out by the bunch of slashdotters. Slashdot is
> very bad at researching the backg
Hi,
Cliff-whoever-he-is should never have posted this question, as it is
downright silly and the quick answer is more than obvious, and the long
answer is not to be found out by the bunch of slashdotters. Slashdot is
very bad at researching the background of the stuff they post.
Thanks anyway
--- Start of forwarded message ---
URL: http://slashdot.org/
Ask Slashdot: HURD For 'Big Iron'?
News Posted by Cliff on
Wednesday October 18, @07:18AM
from the stuff-to-think-about dept.
Julian Stoev wrote in with this query: "Recently I've se
Here it is:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/02/01/1642229&mode=thread
It's about some people who preinstalls Hurd on systems, but it should be a
good discussion base nevertheless.
Mark Lundeberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.pgfn.bc.ca/~aa026/
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 12:56:50AM +0100, David Madore wrote:
>
> I've posted a few comments, trying not to say *too* much nonsense. If
> a more knowledgeable person could come in and check for inaccuracies
> in the discussion, it might be a good idea.
Well, what I read so far from you is pretty
Hi.
There's another discussion about the Hurd taking place on Slashdot
currently:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/01/09/097223&mode=thread
(the starting point being that some English company offers computers
with Debian GNU/Hurd pre-installed alongside GNU/Linux).
I'v
22 matches
Mail list logo
