Hi,
b...@decadent.org.uk said:
> > I've also provided a couple of kernel patches in the past. I'm cross
> > testing with Gentoo to ensure that bugs I report are Debian-specific
> > or ia64-generic.
> >
> > I'll continue testing/software development activity on ia64 for the
> > Jessie cycle, and m
On 21-Sep-13, at 7:23 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
I'll continue testing/software development activity on ia64 for the
Jessie cycle, and more generally, until Debian drops ia64. I'm
already
waiting for Wayland on ia64 and other big updates.
So please, keep ia64 in the bandwagon ;-)
But I don't
On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 19:36 +0200, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a long-time ia64 Debian user (> 10 years). I'm mostly focused on
> desktop aspects (GNOME, Iceweasel, LibreOffice, Qt Creator, C++ 3D
> software development) while most other ia64 users that I know are more
> inclined on serve
Hi,
I'm a long-time ia64 Debian user (> 10 years). I'm mostly focused on
desktop aspects (GNOME, Iceweasel, LibreOffice, Qt Creator, C++ 3D
software development) while most other ia64 users that I know are more
inclined on server use.
I'm not a DD/DM, but daily update my ia64 workstation, report
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:19:24AM -0400, Federico Sologuren wrote:
> i have a HP Visualize B2000 that i managed to install last night from iso
> distribution that i found after a lot of looking. at this point only
> terminal is working. will keep reading to get debian up and running.
>
> i would
i have a HP Visualize B2000 that i managed to install last night from iso
distribution that i found after a lot of looking. at this point only
terminal is working. will keep reading to get debian up and running.
i would like to get involved. will need some additional information on what
is needed
(Status
update)
Hi,
I am an active tester (not always porter) for the following architectures and I
intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
i386, amd64, armel
- test most base packages on this architecture (every day tasks)
- test arch-related things
- test lots of
FWIW, I am a porter of the Alpha architecture in the following ways:
- run a buildd
- kernel support
- work with upstreams for toolchain support
- general porting work including filing bugs and patches
I doubt if I will continue that for the life cycle of Jessie given that
many of the former
Hi,
I am an active tester (not always porter) for the following architectures and I
intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
i386, amd64, armel
- test most base packages on this architecture (every day tasks)
- test arch-related things
- test lots of ipv6 related issues
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far.
> First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied!
>
> So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
>
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 19 Sep 2013 12:55:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > > If you are (or intend to become) an active porter for the lifetime of
> > > jessie, then please send a signed email explaining your involvement in
> > > the port to the Release Team be
Hi :),
I am an active developer for the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For hurd-i386, I
- test those packages on this architecture relevant to my development work
- fix arch-related bugs
- improve the Hurd in general, with focus on th
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 19 Sep 2013 12:55:20 +0200, a écrit :
> Niels Thykier, le Thu 19 Sep 2013 10:38:29 +0200, a écrit :
> > So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
> >hurd-i386
>
> It seems that for some unknown reason I never got to read your mail
> actual
Niels Thykier, le Thu 19 Sep 2013 10:38:29 +0200, a écrit :
> So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
>hurd-i386
It seems that for some unknown reason I never got to read your mail
actually. For debian-hurd@ people who would like to answer, here is the
mail:
g template as your reply:
>
> [...]
>
> Niels, on behalf of the release team
>
> [LAST-BITS]
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2013/08/msg6.html
>
> [WIKI] https://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/Jessie
>
Hi all,
Here is a little status upda
Hi, in order not to leave all results on #hurd@irc I'm updating the
current status:
with my patched eglibc supporting SCM_CREDS this is the current test
status:
good news: all 10 gamin tests pass, 5(8) dbus, 51(52) glib2.0, 58(62)
glib2.0/gio
bad news: emacs in X still hangs, many X-window sessions
(already sent to d-boot)
On Tuesday 07 March 2006 13:52, Frans Pop wrote:
> I am very happy to announce that the debian-installer images targeted
> for Beta2 are now in testing (except AMD64) and that daily (etch_d-i)
> netinst and buisinesscard CD images using them are now available from
> [1]. T
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 01:52:49PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> I am very happy to announce that the debian-installer images targeted for
> Beta2 are now in testing (except AMD64) and that daily (etch_d-i) netinst
> and buisinesscard CD images using them are now available from [1].
> These images us
I am very happy to announce that the debian-installer images targeted for
Beta2 are now in testing (except AMD64) and that daily (etch_d-i) netinst
and buisinesscard CD images using them are now available from [1].
These images use the 2.6.15-7 kernel.
Note: full CD images are not yet available,
I've made a complete mess of CD images for Beta2 so far as the result of a
wrong assumption. This means, as some installation reports and comments
have shown, that CD images linked from [1] have been broken since last
Friday.
The good news is that there are now good Beta2 netinst and businessca
On Sat, 2002-12-14 at 09:26, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > glibc-2.3.1 seems to cut our uptime in half. With glibc-2.2.x I could
> > build all of glibc natively, and with glibc-2.3 I can't.
>
> As we found out before, I can build in glibc-2.3. I am not sure why you
> can't.
Interesting. I thoug
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:55:17PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> glibc-2.3.1 seems to cut our uptime in half. With glibc-2.2.x I could
> build all of glibc natively, and with glibc-2.3 I can't.
As we found out before, I can build in glibc-2.3. I am not sure why you
can't.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`R
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> libdb4.0 still doesn't appear to be fixed by the Debian maintainer,
> despite the cross-arch FTBFS bugs on it. I'll compile it and post on
> alpha. Perhaps then we can actually get perl-5.8. *sigh*
Boo! No mc! No manpages!
> It appears that the gcc-
Here's a quick update for where we seem to be at for hurd-i386.
I now have a machine at home with the Hurd running on it again, so I can
do some work when my brain is too tired for the RC bugs in glibc. ;)
The buildd should start spewing out packages this week. Ryan and Nick
have agreed to keep
* [Jeff Bailey]
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:51:30PM +0200, Oystein Viggen wrote:
>
>> > 2) Buildd is now running, and reports are appearing at
>> > http://buildd.debian.org/
>
>> Does this mean that hurd-i386 will be appearing on the stats/ page
>> at the same URL in a while, too? (Gotta love t
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:51:30PM +0200, Oystein Viggen wrote:
> > 2) Buildd is now running, and reports are appearing at
> > http://buildd.debian.org/
> Does this mean that hurd-i386 will be appearing on the stats/ page
> at the same URL in a while, too? (Gotta love them stats ;)
I don't know
* [Jeff Bailey]
> 2) Buildd is now running, and reports are appearing at
> http://buildd.debian.org/
Does this mean that hurd-i386 will be appearing on the stats/ page at
the same URL in a while, too? (Gotta love them stats ;)
Oystein
--
When in doubt: Think again.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Here's an overall status update:
1) libc0.3 was accepted last night. It should be in today's dinstall
(or katie, or something. I can't keep all the ladies who run Debian
straight in my head)
2) Buildd is now running, and reports are appearing at
http://buildd.debian.org/
Not
Okay, so here's a snapshot of what's happening over the next month and
a bit or so:
By the 15th, I will have moved my turtle box to another facility and
will be disconnecting my Internet access at home.
On the 21st, I fly to New York.
>From the 26th to the 10th, I will be on vacation.
I will not
FYI - With the RedHat 7.1 release filling up the mirrors, I haven't
been able to get any source files off of my local mirror for a couple
of days. I'll try again tonight. I'm away for the weekend, so the
next attempt will be Sunday night.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 02:27:00AM -0500, Igor Khavkine wrote:
> [ snip ]
> > mutt: Wants libsasl
> [ snip ]
>
> You should add libsasl to your package list, you only need to apply
> my patch (http://alcor.concordia.ca/~i_khavki/cyrus-sasl-1.5.24.diff.gz)
> I don't think I ever submitted it to th
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 05:30:41PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Do you think it would be okay to put these in my homedirectory on the
> > Debian web server? I can ftp them off no prob.
>
> Of course.
Lovely. I'll set this up with my next batch of packages.
> > Do you have a changelog e
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:36:08PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > It would be useful to have a full status on the whole source archive.
> > However, we don't want to build them all. So just add a directory for every
> > source package, and put it on hold immediately[1] (by setting the
> > "suspende
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 10:29:20PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 06:10:51AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > > Since you are building so many packages, it would be helpful if I could
> > > look at an automated web page that tells me the status of each package,
> > > and i
> "Igor" == Igor Khavkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Igor> You should add libsasl to your package list, you only need
Igor> to apply my patch
Igor> (http://alcor.concordia.ca/~i_khavki/cyrus-sasl-1.5.24.diff.gz)
Igor> I don't think I ever submitted it to the debian maintainer,
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 03:37:47PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
[ snip ]
> mutt: Wants libsasl
[ snip ]
You should add libsasl to your package list, you only need to apply
my patch (http://alcor.concordia.ca/~i_khavki/cyrus-sasl-1.5.24.diff.gz)
I don't think I ever submitted it to the debian maintain
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 06:20:49AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Okay - Are maintainers typically willing to accept these changes?
>
> The Debian maintainer will have to, because unbuildable packages get a bug
> with severity "important". Upstream should be willing, too.
I'm going to be '
On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 06:10:51AM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > Since you are building so many packages, it would be helpful if I could
> > look at an automated web page that tells me the status of each package,
> > and ideally lets me get the full output of the last build attempt.
>
> I ho
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:09:43PM -0800, Known Human Nick Rusnov wrote:
> >Yup - I have been talking to Marcus about exactly this kind of
> >delegation. I have 1 full-time Hurd system, and 2 other machines that
> >can be nighttime hurd boxes so I need this to coordinate between them anyway.
>
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 05:53:24PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> > Anything that uses termio.h is usually very easy to convert to use the
> > POSIX.1 termios.h interface instead, and that is a better thing to use on
> > Linux as well.
>
> Okay - Are maintainers typically willing to accept these chan
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:56:31PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > If you're interested in helping me get some of these to compile, let me
> > know - I'd like to avoid duplication of effort (I cheerfully will let
> > other people do any of the work they want to!)
>
> Since you are building so m
> > Anything that uses termio.h is usually very easy to convert to use the
> > POSIX.1 termios.h interface instead, and that is a better thing to use on
> > Linux as well.
>
> Okay - Are maintainers typically willing to accept these changes?
I would think so. The termio.h interfaces are deprecat
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>it was written:
>On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:56:31PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> If such a system is set up and does a little bit of extra
>> coordination to farm out pieces of the work, then several of us can set up
>> hurd machines that spend their spare time work
On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 06:56:31PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > binutils: Crashes the Hurd mid-compile
>
> Is this a crash whose details have been reported?
Sort of, I reported it to bug-hurd, and you suggested that it's the proc
server dying. I haven't done the whole sub-hurd thing, becaus
> binutils: Crashes the Hurd mid-compile
Is this a crash whose details have been reported?
> gawk: Makefile bug
> jed: Depends on latex2html, which isn't installable
> findutils: Source failure
> elvis-tiny: Needs termio.h, which libc6-dev provides but libc0.2-dev doesn't
Anything that uses ter
I figured that I should give a status update as far as package building goes:
My Hurd builder is tracking the following packages:
ae bzip2gcc-2.95 libgmp3 mutt tcp-wrappers
anacron cpio gcc-defaults libsigc++ ncursestextutils
apt
46 matches
Mail list logo
