Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-13 Thread Joel Baker
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 03:44:12AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it into a

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-13 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 11:33:02AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: I don't think so. site.def uses site local specific setting. Distribution common settings should not into this file. ok. - you're moving stuff into debian.cf that isn't actualy debian-specific. when i said

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-13 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Robert Millan wrote: ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf? Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system? Glibc requires GCC[1], which in turn requires (in most cases[2]) GNU binutils. [1]

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-13 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 04:33:35PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: Robert Millan wrote: ISHIKAWA, what about splitting all common stuff into Debian.cf, and Glibc-specific stuff into Glibc.cf? Isn't it right that any glibc-based system is GNU system? no. the GNU system is not a set of C

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-12 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: daniel Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003) New Revision: 183 Added: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-12 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:55:06AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: Added: branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/patches/820_gnu-freebsd_config.diff Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf). thanks! i'll

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-12 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:55:06AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] X Strike Force SVN Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: daniel Date: 2003-06-12 08:21:25 -0500 (Thu, 12 Jun 2003) New Revision: 183 Added:

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-12 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it into a gnu-common.cf file so that it can be shared with gnu-freebsd.cf (see the header comments in patch #820) I just wrote same idea into my TODO list

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-12 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps, #820 patch is needed to add Xrender,Xft and Xcursor related defined. They are also need in #800(gnu.cf) and #824 (NetBSD.cf). Thanks, Ishikawa-san. I'll fix this up tonight, if you haven't already. Good morning,

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-12 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it into a gnu-common.cf file so that it can be shared with gnu-freebsd.cf (see the header

Re: X Strike Force SVN commit: rev 183 - in branches/4.3.0/sid/debian: . patches

2003-06-12 Thread ISHIKAWA Mutsumi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 09:27:31AM +0900, ISHIKAWA Mutsumi wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: btw, if someone is going to fix gnu.cf, please consider splitting it into a