On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 12:25:29PM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> I think the one great strength rpm's have over deb's is that they
> appear to have all there packaging stuff in one library, whereas we
> have bits and pieces scattered everywhere in all sorts of languages.
I would have trouble desc
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 18:37:20 -0700
Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't suppose doogie mentioned whether this feature was coming
> before or after the upcoming iceage, did he? =)
>
No, i wondered myself, but wasnt in the mood to push him.
> I can't complain, I don't speak enough Perl
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 11:27:43AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> >The .shlibs file doesnt mention any path, so does the path (/usr/lib or
> > /lib) really need to be considered when dpkg-shlibdeps tries to find a
> > match ? (maybe its a dumb question)
> Im told on #deiban-devel
> the plan is t
>The .shlibs file doesnt mention any path, so does the path (/usr/lib or
> /lib) really need to be considered when dpkg-shlibdeps tries to find a
> match ? (maybe its a dumb question)
>
Im told on #deiban-devel
the plan is to have dpkg strip the path, match on filename, then
on the resultant ma
Im back trying to compile gcc-3.2, my latest attempt at building it failed
due expect being broken.
expect was broken because i didnt have tcl8.3 installed which should be
declared as a dependency against expect, but isnt picked up when building
on the hurd.
Im a bit confused as to whats going on
5 matches
Mail list logo
