On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 10:08:40PM +, Philip Charles wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> > > Marcus, earlier this week I downloaded the latest tarball
> > > and lots of files and directories have the gr
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> > Marcus, earlier this week I downloaded the latest tarball
> > and lots of files and directories have the group id set to
> > 1000, so forexample /info and 5-7 other toplevel directo
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 05:53:55PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2000-10-01 at 14:59 Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> >> Marcus, earlier this week I downloaded the latest tarba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2000-10-01 at 14:59 Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
>> Marcus, earlier this week I downloaded the latest tarball
>> and lots of files and directories have the group id set to
>> 1000, so f
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 07:52:28PM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Marcus, earlier this week I downloaded the latest tarball
> and lots of files and directories have the group id set to
> 1000, so forexample /info and 5-7 other toplevel directories
> has that group. Also X did complain about stan
Marcus, earlier this week I downloaded the latest tarball
and lots of files and directories have the group id set to
1000, so forexample /info and 5-7 other toplevel directories
has that group. Also X did complain about stange file owners.
(yes, I did unpack using the --same-owner and zxvpf options
6 matches
Mail list logo
